Re: [PULL 02/22] arm: tcg: Adhere to SMCCC 1.3 section 5.2

2021-11-19 Thread Peter Maydell
On Fri, 19 Nov 2021 at 10:35, Alexander Graf wrote: > Ugh :(. Conceptually, once you tell QEMU to handle PSCI, you're > basically giving up that EL to it. It sounds almost as if what these > boards (imx6ul + highbank) want is an EL4 they can call into to deflect > PSCI calls into from EL3 they own

Re: [PULL 02/22] arm: tcg: Adhere to SMCCC 1.3 section 5.2

2021-11-19 Thread Alexander Graf
On 18.11.21 22:57, Peter Maydell wrote: On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 16:12, Peter Maydell wrote: From: Alexander Graf The SMCCC 1.3 spec section 5.2 says The Unknown SMC Function Identifier is a sign-extended value of (-1) that is returned in the R0, W0 or X0 registers. An implementation

Re: [PULL 02/22] arm: tcg: Adhere to SMCCC 1.3 section 5.2

2021-11-18 Thread Peter Maydell
On Thu, 30 Sept 2021 at 16:12, Peter Maydell wrote: > > From: Alexander Graf > > The SMCCC 1.3 spec section 5.2 says > > The Unknown SMC Function Identifier is a sign-extended value of (-1) > that is returned in the R0, W0 or X0 registers. An implementation must > return this error code whe

[PULL 02/22] arm: tcg: Adhere to SMCCC 1.3 section 5.2

2021-09-30 Thread Peter Maydell
From: Alexander Graf The SMCCC 1.3 spec section 5.2 says The Unknown SMC Function Identifier is a sign-extended value of (-1) that is returned in the R0, W0 or X0 registers. An implementation must return this error code when it receives: * An SMC or HVC call with an unknown Function I