Daniel P. Berrangé writes:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 02:01:12PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
>> From: Paolo Bonzini
>>
>> s390-ccw remains a bit more complex, because the -march=z900 test is done
>> only for the native cross compiler. Otherwise, all that is needed is
>> to pass the (now
On Mon, Oct 10, 2022 at 01:54:16PM +0100, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 02:01:12PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > From: Paolo Bonzini
> >
> > s390-ccw remains a bit more complex, because the -march=z900 test is done
> > only for the native cross compiler. Otherwise, all
On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 02:01:12PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> From: Paolo Bonzini
>
> s390-ccw remains a bit more complex, because the -march=z900 test is done
> only for the native cross compiler. Otherwise, all that is needed is
> to pass the (now mandatory) target argument to
On Tue, Oct 04, 2022 at 02:01:12PM +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> From: Paolo Bonzini
>
> s390-ccw remains a bit more complex, because the -march=z900 test is done
> only for the native cross compiler. Otherwise, all that is needed is
> to pass the (now mandatory) target argument to
From: Paolo Bonzini
s390-ccw remains a bit more complex, because the -march=z900 test is done
only for the native cross compiler. Otherwise, all that is needed is
to pass the (now mandatory) target argument to write_target_makefile.
Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini
Signed-off-by: Alex Bennée
