From: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.d...@intel.com>

vfio_display_dmabuf_init() and vfio_display_region_init() calls
ramfb_setup() without checking its return value.

So we may run into a situation that vfio_display_probe() succeed
but errp is set. This is risky and may lead to assert failure in
error_setv().

Cc: Gerd Hoffmann <kra...@redhat.com>
Fixes: b290659fc3d ("hw/vfio/display: add ramfb support")
Signed-off-by: Zhenzhong Duan <zhenzhong.d...@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Cédric Le Goater <c...@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Cédric Le Goater <c...@redhat.com>
---
 hw/vfio/display.c | 6 ++++++
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)

diff --git a/hw/vfio/display.c b/hw/vfio/display.c
index 
fe624a6c9b86e7204e2763ab62ef60903f19d350..d28b724102d5970cb2b9dc7464dc7575b6f441d9
 100644
--- a/hw/vfio/display.c
+++ b/hw/vfio/display.c
@@ -361,6 +361,9 @@ static int vfio_display_dmabuf_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, 
Error **errp)
                                           vdev);
     if (vdev->enable_ramfb) {
         vdev->dpy->ramfb = ramfb_setup(errp);
+        if (!vdev->dpy->ramfb) {
+            return -EINVAL;
+        }
     }
     vfio_display_edid_init(vdev);
     return 0;
@@ -488,6 +491,9 @@ static int vfio_display_region_init(VFIOPCIDevice *vdev, 
Error **errp)
                                           vdev);
     if (vdev->enable_ramfb) {
         vdev->dpy->ramfb = ramfb_setup(errp);
+        if (!vdev->dpy->ramfb) {
+            return -EINVAL;
+        }
     }
     return 0;
 }
-- 
2.45.1


Reply via email to