subject:"\[Qemu\-devel\] \[question\] is it possible that big\-endian l1 tableoffsetreferencedby other I\/O while updating l1 table offset in qcow2_update_snapshot_refcount\?"

Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] is it possible that big-endian l1 tableoffsetreferencedby other I/O while updating l1 table offset in qcow2_update_snapshot_refcount?

2014-10-13 Thread Zhang Haoyu

Hi, I encounter a problem that after deleting snapshot, the qcow2 image size is very larger than that it should be displayed by ls command, but the virtual disk size is okay via qemu-img info. I suspect that during updating l1 table offset, other I/O job reference the big-endian l1 table

Re: [Qemu-devel] [question] is it possible that big-endian l1 tableoffsetreferencedby other I/O while updating l1 table offset in qcow2_update_snapshot_refcount?

2014-10-13 Thread Max Reitz

Am 13.10.2014 um 10:19 schrieb Zhang Haoyu: Hi, I encounter a problem that after deleting snapshot, the qcow2 image size is very larger than that it should be displayed by ls command, but the virtual disk size is okay via qemu-img info. I suspect that during updating l1 table offset, other I/O