[Expired for QEMU because there has been no activity for 60 days.]
** Changed in: qemu
Status: Incomplete => Expired
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1689499
Title:
OK, it'll be interesting if you get something repeatable, but sometimes
these type of bugs go and hide in a dark corner until someone trips over
them in a more critical situation.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
Ok, I found an hour to set up a test environment.
I already had all the bisect script written until the systems were ready, but
unfortunately it is not reproducible enough with my build from git as of
today's master - out of 8 tries it showed as less of a slowdown once, and never
to the hours
I'm "incompleting" myself until I was able to provide more :-/
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of qemu-
devel-ml, which is subscribed to QEMU.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1689499
Title:
copy-storage-all/inc does not easily converge with load going on
Status
On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 12:41 PM, Dr. David Alan Gilbert wrote:
> Interesting.
> That's quite a big difference, so if you could bisect it down it would be
> interesting to figure out where the change occurred.
>
Hi David,
if it turns out to stay reproducible enough I can
Interesting.
That's quite a big difference, so if you could bisect it down it would be
interesting to figure out where the change occurred.
What happens if you just make it a 'disk' workload without the memory
stress?
What network interface (1G/10G etc) are you migrating over and what
bandwidth