Hi Kevin,
I'm using the bdrv_pread() function during boot partition detection ...
In detail:
bdrv_pread() is called to read 32 bytes from a 2048 bytes formatted
disk. This results in setting up a read of 512 bytes (1 sector
multiplied by 512 current code in paio_submit()), which is wrong for a
Am 11.12.2012 10:58, schrieb Heinz Graalfs:
Hi Kevin,
I'm using the bdrv_pread() function during boot partition detection ...
In detail:
bdrv_pread() is called to read 32 bytes from a 2048 bytes formatted
disk. This results in setting up a read of 512 bytes (1 sector
multiplied by 512
On Tue, 2012-12-11 at 11:30 +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 11.12.2012 10:58, schrieb Heinz Graalfs:
Hi Kevin,
I'm using the bdrv_pread() function during boot partition detection ...
In detail:
bdrv_pread() is called to read 32 bytes from a 2048 bytes formatted
disk. This results in
Am 07.12.2012 21:26, schrieb Heinz Graalfs:
Hello Kevin,
I'm resending my answer as of Nov 23rd.
Is this still on your queue?
No, it wasn't. I guess I was waiting for a new version of the patch.
}
void *qemu_blockalign(BlockDriverState *bs, size_t size)
diff --git
Hello Kevin,
I'm resending my answer as of Nov 23rd.
Is this still on your queue?
Heinz
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 10:15 +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 21.11.2012 09:58, schrieb Christian Borntraeger:
From: Heinz Graalfs graa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
While testing IPL code (booting) for s390x we
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 10:15 +0100, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 21.11.2012 09:58, schrieb Christian Borntraeger:
From: Heinz Graalfs graa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
While testing IPL code (booting) for s390x we faced some problems
with cache=none on dasds (4k block size) on bdrv_preads with length
On 21/11/12 17:03, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 21/11/2012 10:15, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
+if ((bs-open_flags BDRV_O_NOCACHE)) {
+bs-file-buffer_alignment = align;
+}
Any reason to restrict this to BDRV_O_NOCACHE?
There have been patches to change the BDRV_O_NOCACHE flag from the
From: Heinz Graalfs graa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
While testing IPL code (booting) for s390x we faced some problems
with cache=none on dasds (4k block size) on bdrv_preads with length
values != block size.
This patch makes sure that bdrv_pread and friends work fine with
unaligned access even with
Am 21.11.2012 09:58, schrieb Christian Borntraeger:
From: Heinz Graalfs graa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
While testing IPL code (booting) for s390x we faced some problems
with cache=none on dasds (4k block size) on bdrv_preads with length
values != block size.
This patch makes sure that
On 21/11/12 10:15, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 21.11.2012 09:58, schrieb Christian Borntraeger:
From: Heinz Graalfs graa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
While testing IPL code (booting) for s390x we faced some problems
with cache=none on dasds (4k block size) on bdrv_preads with length
values != block size.
On Wed, 2012-11-21 at 11:00 +0100, Christian Borntraeger wrote:
On 21/11/12 10:15, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 21.11.2012 09:58, schrieb Christian Borntraeger:
From: Heinz Graalfs graa...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
While testing IPL code (booting) for s390x we faced some problems
with cache=none on
Il 21/11/2012 10:15, Kevin Wolf ha scritto:
+if ((bs-open_flags BDRV_O_NOCACHE)) {
+bs-file-buffer_alignment = align;
+}
Any reason to restrict this to BDRV_O_NOCACHE?
There have been patches to change the BDRV_O_NOCACHE flag from the
monitor, in which case
12 matches
Mail list logo
