On Wed, Sep 26, 2007 at 11:23:30AM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As written in the MIPS TODO file, the lwl, lwr, ldl, ldr, swl, swr,
> sdl and sdr instructions are not correctly implemented. In case of
> exception the BadVAddr register gets the aligned address instead of the
> unaligned
Fabrice Bellard a écrit :
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As written in the MIPS TODO file, the lwl, lwr, ldl, ldr, swl, swr,
>> sdl and sdr instructions are not correctly implemented. In case of
>> exception the BadVAddr register gets the aligned address instead of the
>> unaligned original
Fabrice Bellard a écrit :
> Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> As written in the MIPS TODO file, the lwl, lwr, ldl, ldr, swl, swr,
>> sdl and sdr instructions are not correctly implemented. In case of
>> exception the BadVAddr register gets the aligned address instead of the
>> unaligned original
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi,
As written in the MIPS TODO file, the lwl, lwr, ldl, ldr, swl, swr,
sdl and sdr instructions are not correctly implemented. In case of
exception the BadVAddr register gets the aligned address instead of the
unaligned original address.
In addition to that, the store i
Aurelien Jarno wrote:
Hi,
As written in the MIPS TODO file, the lwl, lwr, ldl, ldr, swl, swr,
sdl and sdr instructions are not correctly implemented. In case of
exception the BadVAddr register gets the aligned address instead of the
unaligned original address.
In addition to that, the store i
Hi,
As written in the MIPS TODO file, the lwl, lwr, ldl, ldr, swl, swr,
sdl and sdr instructions are not correctly implemented. In case of
exception the BadVAddr register gets the aligned address instead of the
unaligned original address.
In addition to that, the store instructions are generatin