On 02/19/2012 01:36 PM, Alexander Barabash wrote:
The proposed object_property_get_child() may return either
the direct child with the specified name in the composition tree,
or the value of the link with the specified name, as
object_property_get_link() indeed does.
Have you actually
On 02/20/2012 11:11 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 02/19/2012 01:36 PM, Alexander Barabash wrote:
The proposed object_property_get_child() may return either
the direct child with the specified name in the composition tree,
or the value of the link with the specified name, as
On 02/20/2012 12:13 PM, Alexander Barabash wrote:
I would only suggest that the documentation of object_property_add_child()
be amended to reflect the fact that the child object may be retrieved using
object_property_get_link().
Sure, feel free to post a patch for that or to add a synonym with
On 02/17/2012 12:17 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Besides the non-triviality of the patch, how is this different from
object_property_get_link? Perhaps we should just rename that one to
object_property_get_obj, or add a function that is just a synonym.
As for the patch's (non-)triviality, I just
Besides the non-triviality of the patch, how is this different from
object_property_get_link? Perhaps we should just rename that one to
object_property_get_obj, or add a function that is just a synonym.
+ */
+Object *object_property_get_child(Object *obj, const char *name,
+
Add object_property_get_child().
Adding a direct accessor to a child property.
In the existing implementation, object_property_get() must be used,
with with a visitor, implementing the 'type_str' callback,
receiving the child's canonical path.
In the new
On 16 February 2012 17:39, Alexander Barabash
alexander_barab...@mentor.com wrote:
Add object_property_get_child().
Adding a direct accessor to a child property.
In the existing implementation, object_property_get() must be used,
with with a visitor, implementing the 'type_str'
