On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 08:58:34PM +0200, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 07:29:49PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > Dan Kenigsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >
> > > +x86_cpu_def->vendor1 = val[0] + (val[1] << 8)
> > > + + (v
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 07:29:49PM +0100, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Dan Kenigsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > +x86_cpu_def->vendor1 = val[0] + (val[1] << 8)
> > + + (val[2] << 16) + (val[3] << 24);
> > +x86_cpu_def->vendor2 =
Dan Kenigsberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> +x86_cpu_def->vendor1 = val[0] + (val[1] << 8)
> + + (val[2] << 16) + (val[3] << 24);
> +x86_cpu_def->vendor2 = val[4] + (val[5] << 8)
> + + (val[6]
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 11:36:34AM +, Paul Brook wrote:
> > +x86_cpu_def->vendor1 = cpu_to_le32(*(uint32_t *)val);
> > +x86_cpu_def->vendor2 = cpu_to_le32(*(uint32_t *)(val +
> > 4)); +x86_cpu_def->vendor3 = cpu_to_le32(*(uint32_t *)(val
>
> Stil
> +x86_cpu_def->vendor1 = cpu_to_le32(*(uint32_t *)val);
> +x86_cpu_def->vendor2 = cpu_to_le32(*(uint32_t *)(val +
> 4)); +x86_cpu_def->vendor3 = cpu_to_le32(*(uint32_t *)(val
Still not good enough. val might not be aligned.
Paul
On Sun, Dec 09, 2007 at 03:02:44AM +, Thiemo Seufer wrote:
> Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> > Having AuthenticAMD hard-coded is nice, but allowing the user to impersonate
> > whatever CPU she wants is even nicer.
> >
> > Also, an English typo (due to me) is corrected.
> >
> > Dan.
> >
> > --- a/tar
Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
> Having AuthenticAMD hard-coded is nice, but allowing the user to impersonate
> whatever CPU she wants is even nicer.
>
> Also, an English typo (due to me) is corrected.
>
> Dan.
>
> --- a/target-i386/helper2.c
> +++ b/target-i386/helper2.c
> @@ -254,8 +254,17 @@ static in
Having AuthenticAMD hard-coded is nice, but allowing the user to impersonate
whatever CPU she wants is even nicer.
Also, an English typo (due to me) is corrected.
Dan.
--- a/target-i386/helper2.c
+++ b/target-i386/helper2.c
@@ -254,8 +254,17 @@ static int cpu_x86_find_by_name(x86_def_t *x86_cpu_
