On Tuesday 11 December 2007, andrzej zaborowski wrote:
On 10/12/2007, Balazs Attila-Mihaly (Cd-MaN) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here goes v0.2 for my patch :-)
Changes
- now the option is a separate command line switch:
-net capture,vlan=2,file=test.pcap
- it is also available from the
Here goes v0.2 for my patch :-)
Changes
- now the option is a separate command line switch:
-net capture,vlan=2,file=test.pcap
- it is also available from the monitor
- added some more constants / defines to avoid repeating portions of the code
Balazs Attila-Mihaly (Cd-MaN) wrote:
Here goes v0.2 for my patch :-)
Changes
- now the option is a separate command line switch:
-net capture,vlan=2,file=test.pcap
Is it really necessary/useful to specify this on the command line since
it can be controlled from the monitor?
Regards,
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Balazs Attila-Mihaly (Cd-MaN) wrote:
Here goes v0.2 for my patch :-)
Changes
- now the option is a separate command line switch:
-net capture,vlan=2,file=test.pcap
Is it really necessary/useful to specify this on the command line
On Monday 10 December 2007, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Balazs Attila-Mihaly (Cd-MaN) wrote:
Here goes v0.2 for my patch :-)
Changes
- now the option is a separate command line switch:
-net capture,vlan=2,file=test.pcap
Is it really necessary/useful to specify this on the command line
The use case I need it for is for honeypot-like systems. Ie. the system starts
from a snapshot and accesses links / runs executables while observing the
behaviour. For this use case it is the best if it is setable from the command
line.
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Balazs Attila-Mihaly (Cd-MaN) wrote:
Here goes v0.2 for my patch :-)
Changes
- now the option is a separate command line switch:
-net capture,vlan=2,file=test.pcap
Is it really necessary/useful to
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Balazs Attila-Mihaly (Cd-MaN) wrote:
Here goes v0.2 for my patch :-)
Changes
- now the option is a separate command line switch:
-net
Hi Johannes,
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
However, I have no problem maintaining my own fork. Much like I will do
with VNC again, since I recently had to use QEmu via VNC and the artefacts
are just horrible.
I just sent a patch to the mailing list that should fix those
artifacts.
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
However, I have no problem maintaining my own fork. Much like I will
do with VNC again, since I recently had to use QEmu via VNC and the
artefacts are just horrible.
I just sent a patch to the mailing list
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 10 Dec 2007, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
However, I have no problem maintaining my own fork. Much like I will
do with VNC again, since I recently had to use QEmu via VNC and the
artefacts are just horrible.
I just
Anthony Liguori wrote:
Balazs Attila-Mihaly (Cd-MaN) wrote:
Here goes v0.2 for my patch :-)
Changes
- now the option is a separate command line switch:
-net capture,vlan=2,file=test.pcap
Is it really necessary/useful to specify this on the command line since it
can be controlled
12 matches
Mail list logo
