On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Stuart Anderson wrote:
I have a debian arm chroot setup.
Just to clarify, this is from the applieddata.net repository, not the
normal debian one (which is not eabi).
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007, Paul Brook wrote:
On Monday 19 March 2007 15:30, Stuart Anderson wrote:
When running ARM EABI binaries on x86_64, the target_eabi_flock64
structure is already padded correct so the padding is not needed.
This patch adds an #ifdef to only include the _pad member on 32-but
ho
On [Mon, 19.03.2007 11:30], Stuart Anderson wrote:
>
> When running ARM EABI binaries on x86_64, the target_eabi_flock64
> structure is already padded correct so the padding is not needed.
>
> This patch adds an #ifdef to only include the _pad member on 32-but
> hosts.
Are you sure that problem i
On Monday 19 March 2007 15:30, Stuart Anderson wrote:
> When running ARM EABI binaries on x86_64, the target_eabi_flock64
> structure is already padded correct so the padding is not needed.
> This patch adds an #ifdef to only include the _pad member on 32-but
> hosts.
This is wrong. The struct is
When running ARM EABI binaries on x86_64, the target_eabi_flock64
structure is already padded correct so the padding is not needed.
This patch adds an #ifdef to only include the _pad member on 32-but
hosts.
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson