On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 7:49 PM, Alexandre Raymond wrote:
> Hi Blue,
>
> This patch indeed depends on http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/98325/.
>
> Since it had already been applied by Andreas to the trivial tree, I
> didn't think it was necessary to resend it in the followup.
>
> If you prefer, I
Hi Blue,
This patch indeed depends on http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/98325/.
Since it had already been applied by Andreas to the trivial tree, I
didn't think it was necessary to resend it in the followup.
If you prefer, I can resend both in the same series.
Alexandre
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 6:26 AM, Alexandre Raymond wrote:
> This patch removes all references to signal.h when qemu-common.h is included
> as they become redundant.
This breaks the build. Maybe it depends on some previous patch? If so,
it would be nice to submit the patches as a series so that the
This patch removes all references to signal.h when qemu-common.h is included
as they become redundant.
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Raymond
---
audio/audio_pt_int.c |2 --
audio/sdlaudio.c |1 -
block/raw-posix.c |2 --
bsd-user/syscall.c|1 -
darwin-user/signal.c |
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 11:55 PM, Alexandre Raymond wrote:
> Should I send a follow-up patch to remove signal.h wherever
> qemu-common.h is already included?
Yes, please.
I didn't know that qemu-common.h pulls in system headers so users
don't need to, I always figured .c files should include what
Thanks Stefan,
Should I send a follow-up patch to remove signal.h wherever
qemu-common.h is already included?
Alexandre
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:44 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Alexandre Raymond wrote:
>> Fix the following warning by including signal.h directly
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 3:21 AM, Alexandre Raymond wrote:
> Fix the following warning by including signal.h directly in qemu-common.h
> 8<
> iohandler.c: In function ‘qemu_init_child_watch’:
> iohandler.c:172: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘sigaction’
> iohandler.c:172: warning:
On Thu, Jun 2, 2011 at 6:13 AM, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 02.06.2011 um 04:21 schrieb Alexandre Raymond:
>
>> Fix the following warning by including signal.h directly in qemu-common.h
>> 8<
>> iohandler.c: In function ‘qemu_init_child_watch’:
>> iohandler.c:172: warning: implicit declarat
Am 02.06.2011 um 04:21 schrieb Alexandre Raymond:
Fix the following warning by including signal.h directly in qemu-
common.h
8<
iohandler.c: In function ‘qemu_init_child_watch’:
iohandler.c:172: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘sigaction’
iohandler.c:172: warning: nested exter
Fix the following warning by including signal.h directly in qemu-common.h
8<
iohandler.c: In function ‘qemu_init_child_watch’:
iohandler.c:172: warning: implicit declaration of function ‘sigaction’
iohandler.c:172: warning: nested extern declaration of ‘sigaction’
8<
Signed-off-by:
10 matches
Mail list logo