On Thu, Mar 09, 2006 at 03:00:13AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I placed a patch on The Qemu Forum (qemu.dad-answers.com) that already
> provides this capability in a more inclusive manner. That is, you can remote
> the console (monitor) through any active pty or pipe process. Telnet could b
I placed a patch on The Qemu Forum (qemu.dad-answers.com) that already
provides this capability in a more inclusive manner. That is, you can remote
the console (monitor) through any active pty or pipe process. Telnet could be
one choice to get the functionality you are getting at here.
Then aga
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 11:22:29PM +0100, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> Daniel Veillard schrieb:
> > I need first to find the ports of the
> > QEmu instances (plural, if you limit to one per box, then you can block the
> > default port number and there would be no problem) on a local machine. I
> > don'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Veillard schrieb:
> On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 05:24:40PM +0100, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
>
>>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>Hash: SHA1
>>
>>Daniel Veillard schrieb:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>>enclosed is a first version of a patch to allow remote acce
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 09:52:11AM -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> Hi,
>
> enclosed is a first version of a patch to allow remote access and control
> for QEmu instances,
I have put an updated version of the patch and client code example at
ftp://veillard.com/libvirt/qemu-patch
it fixed t
On Sat, Mar 11, 2006 at 05:24:40PM +0100, Oliver Gerlich wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Daniel Veillard schrieb:
> > Hi,
> >
> > enclosed is a first version of a patch to allow remote access and control
> > for QEmu instances, I'm not suggesting to apply it as is (
On Wed, Mar 08, 2006 at 12:35:13PM -0800, Ed Swierk wrote:
> Daniel Veillard wrote:
> > enclosed is a first version of a patch to allow remote access and control
> > for QEmu instances, I'm not suggesting to apply it as is (though it seems
> > to work in my limited testing) but would rather like to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Veillard schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> enclosed is a first version of a patch to allow remote access and control
> for QEmu instances, I'm not suggesting to apply it as is (though it seems
> to work in my limited testing) but would rather like to get co
Daniel Veillard wrote:
> enclosed is a first version of a patch to allow remote access and control
> for QEmu instances, I'm not suggesting to apply it as is (though it seems
> to work in my limited testing) but would rather like to get comments back
> for choices I'm facing.
This sounds pretty ni
Hi,
enclosed is a first version of a patch to allow remote access and control
for QEmu instances, I'm not suggesting to apply it as is (though it seems
to work in my limited testing) but would rather like to get comments back
for choices I'm facing.
First a bit of context, I'm working on libv
10 matches
Mail list logo
