On Feb 12, 2007, at 2:41 AM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This is one I introduced in the gcc-3.x autodetect. It's against
CVS from a little while ago so hopefully it's just fuzz.
AFAICT "which" is not really portable,
Johannes Schindelin wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This is one I introduced in the gcc-3.x autodetect. It's against CVS
from a little while ago so hopefully it's just fuzz.
AFAICT "which" is not really portable, either. But then, I always have a
bash, so I r
Hi,
On Sat, 10 Feb 2007, Anthony Liguori wrote:
> This is one I introduced in the gcc-3.x autodetect. It's against CVS
> from a little while ago so hopefully it's just fuzz.
AFAICT "which" is not really portable, either. But then, I always have a
bash, so I really don't care.
Ciao,
Dscho
This is one I introduced in the gcc-3.x autodetect. It's against CVS
from a little while ago so hopefully it's just fuzz.
Regards,
Anthony Liguori
diff -r 00e394f6a849 configure
--- a/configure Sat Feb 10 19:59:51 2007 -0600
+++ b/configure Sat Feb 10 20:03:13 2007 -0600
@@ -339,7 +339,7 @@ in
