Hi there,
On Nov 21, 2007 2:07 PM, Tomoyoshi ASANO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tested big-endian binaries by sh4(eb)-linux-user
with a small patch(attached) for building sh4eb-linux-user.
But I don't understand that this patch is needed or not.
I'm not sure if that patch is all that is needed.
Can you provide a glibc and busybox binary for sh4eb so that I can
include them in the linux user tests ?
Regards,
Fabrice.
Tomoyoshi ASANO wrote:
Hello,
I tested big-endian binaries by sh4(eb)-linux-user
with a small patch(attached) for building sh4eb-linux-user.
But I don't understand
Hello Fabrce-san,
I uploaded this URL
http://club.lineo.co.jp/~asa/
4535036 qemu-sh4eb.tar.bz2
Regards,
--
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 10:50:22 +0100
Fabrice Bellard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can you provide a glibc and busybox binary for sh4eb so that I can
include them in the linux user tests
Hello,
I found 6th arg for syscall is missing on SH4 linux-user emulation.
This seems to be the cause of shared library mapping failure.
I successfully run shared-lib'd binary, after applying following fix.
/yoshii
diff -u -r1.155 main.c
--- a/linux-user/main.c 17 Nov 2007 01:37:43 -
Hi there,
On Nov 20, 2007 11:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found 6th arg for syscall is missing on SH4 linux-user emulation.
This seems to be the cause of shared library mapping failure.
I successfully run shared-lib'd binary, after applying following fix.
Hehe, I managed to create the
Hell,
This is very nice!
I tested using glibc-2.5
It seems good.
Thank you
On Wed, 21 Nov 2007 09:24:41 +0900
Magnus Damm [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi there,
On Nov 20, 2007 11:48 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I found 6th arg for syscall is missing on SH4 linux-user emulation.
This
Hello,
I tested big-endian binaries by sh4(eb)-linux-user
with a small patch(attached) for building sh4eb-linux-user.
But I don't understand that this patch is needed or not.
sh4eb-linux-user is OK using static link binaries.
But I feel that sh4eb-linux-users has some problem(?)
using dynamic
