From: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
If compiled with CONFIG_FDT, allow user to specify a device tree file using
the -dtb argument. If the machine supports it then the dtb will be loaded
into memory and passed to the kernel on boot.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr jeremy.k...@canonical.com
On 02/27/2012 11:38 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
From: Grant Likelygrant.lik...@secretlab.ca
If compiled with CONFIG_FDT, allow user to specify a device tree file using
the -dtb argument. If the machine supports it then the dtb will be loaded
into memory and passed to the kernel on boot.
From: Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
If compiled with CONFIG_FDT, allow user to specify a device tree file using
the -dtb argument. If the machine supports it then the dtb will be loaded
into memory and passed to the kernel on boot.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Kerr jeremy.k...@canonical.com
Am 29.01.2012 21:36, schrieb Grant Likely:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 07:13:55PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 29 January 2012 16:01, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
+DEF(dtb, HAS_ARG, QEMU_OPTION_dtb, \
+-dtb file use 'file' as a device tree image\n, QEMU_ARCH_ARM)
Needs
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 12:36:40PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 29.01.2012 21:36, schrieb Grant Likely:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 07:13:55PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 29 January 2012 16:01, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
+DEF(dtb, HAS_ARG, QEMU_OPTION_dtb, \
+-dtb
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 09:29:58PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 29 January 2012 18:48, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Am 29.01.2012 17:01, schrieb Grant Likely:
Okay, well at least let's start with this. Here is an updated version of
the
patch that doesn't touch the board
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 09:54:45AM +1000, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Edgar E. Iglesias edgar.igles...@gmail.com
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:48:37AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:34:01PM +, Paul Brook wrote:
Another major issue with
There is a lot of configuration in the .dts file that the QEMU user may
want to manipulate; particularly when using QEMU for testing embedded
platforms. The direction I want to go is to select the machine model based
on the top level DT compatible property (making -M optional), and then
also
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:15:42AM +, Paul Brook wrote:
Clearly we need to have some sort of FDT support. However I'm unconvinced
that it's the correct format for the primary data structure. For one thing
it's a hierarchical tree structure, and in my experience describing links
Am 29.01.2012 17:01, schrieb Grant Likely:
Okay, well at least let's start with this. Here is an updated version of the
patch that doesn't touch the board code. It makes the -dtb option available
to all ARM platforms.
Even if dtb is not the primary structure, we absolutely need this
On 29 January 2012 16:01, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:15:42AM +, Paul Brook wrote:
Clearly we need to have some sort of FDT support. However I'm unconvinced
that it's the correct format for the primary data structure. For one thing
it's a
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:48:37AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:34:01PM +, Paul Brook wrote:
If compiled with CONFIG_FDT, allow user to specify a device tree file
using
the -dtb argument. If the machine supports it then the dtb will be loaded
into memory
On 29 January 2012 18:48, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Am 29.01.2012 17:01, schrieb Grant Likely:
Okay, well at least let's start with this. Here is an updated version of the
patch that doesn't touch the board code. It makes the -dtb option available
to all ARM platforms.
Even if
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 6:42 AM, Edgar E. Iglesias edgar.igles...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 11:48:37AM -0700, Grant Likely wrote:
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:34:01PM +, Paul Brook wrote:
If compiled with CONFIG_FDT, allow user to specify a device tree
file using
the
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 5:13 AM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 29 January 2012 16:01, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 11:15:42AM +, Paul Brook wrote:
Clearly we need to have some sort of FDT support. However I'm unconvinced
that
On Sun, Jan 29, 2012 at 07:13:55PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 29 January 2012 16:01, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
diff --git a/configure b/configure
index f69e08f..0c2deab 100755
--- a/configure
+++ b/configure
@@ -3411,6 +3411,9 @@ case $target_arch2 in
On Fri, Jan 27, 2012 at 10:34:01PM +, Paul Brook wrote:
If compiled with CONFIG_FDT, allow user to specify a device tree file using
the -dtb argument. If the machine supports it then the dtb will be loaded
into memory and passed to the kernel on boot.
Adding annother machine feels
Hi Grant,
The patch series for dts driven machine creation we (myself and Edgar) use
that you are referring to was rejected a few months ago on the grounds that
it conflicted with QOM:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2011-08/msg02953.html
I am maintaining it our of tree, although I
If compiled with CONFIG_FDT, allow user to specify a device tree file using
the -dtb argument. If the machine supports it then the dtb will be loaded
into memory and passed to the kernel on boot.
Adding annother machine feels wrong. Why does the board specific code need to
know about this at
19 matches
Mail list logo
