On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 06:14:01PM +0800, Dunrong Huang wrote:
The content filename point to will be erased by qemu_opts_absorb_qdict()
in raw_open_common() in drv-bdrv_file_open()
So it's better to use bs-filename.
Signed-off-by: Dunrong Huang riegama...@gmail.com
---
block.c | 4 ++--
On Wed, Oct 2, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi stefa...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 06:14:01PM +0800, Dunrong Huang wrote:
The content filename point to will be erased by qemu_opts_absorb_qdict()
in raw_open_common() in drv-bdrv_file_open()
So it's better to use
ping?
On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 8:12 PM, Max Reitz mre...@redhat.com wrote:
On 2013-09-24 12:14, Dunrong Huang wrote:
The content filename point to will be erased by qemu_opts_absorb_qdict()
in raw_open_common() in drv-bdrv_file_open()
So it's better to use bs-filename.
Signed-off-by:
The content filename point to will be erased by qemu_opts_absorb_qdict()
in raw_open_common() in drv-bdrv_file_open()
So it's better to use bs-filename.
Signed-off-by: Dunrong Huang riegama...@gmail.com
---
block.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/block.c
On 2013-09-24 12:14, Dunrong Huang wrote:
The content filename point to will be erased by qemu_opts_absorb_qdict()
in raw_open_common() in drv-bdrv_file_open()
So it's better to use bs-filename.
Signed-off-by: Dunrong Huang riegama...@gmail.com
---
block.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2