Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> On 06/28/17 11:09 +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
>> Haozhong Zhang wrote:
>> > In cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(rb, start, ...), the 2nd
>> > argument 'start' is relative to the start of the ramblock 'rb'. When
>> > it's used to access the dirty memory bitmap of ram_l
On 06/28/17 11:09 +0200, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> > In cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(rb, start, ...), the 2nd
> > argument 'start' is relative to the start of the ramblock 'rb'. When
> > it's used to access the dirty memory bitmap of ram_list (i.e.
> > ram_list.dirty_
Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> In cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(rb, start, ...), the 2nd
> argument 'start' is relative to the start of the ramblock 'rb'. When
> it's used to access the dirty memory bitmap of ram_list (i.e.
> ram_list.dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_MIGRATION]->blocks[]), an offset to
On 28/06/2017 09:30, Juan Quintela wrote:
> Haozhong Zhang wrote:
>> In cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(rb, start, ...), the 2nd
>> argument 'start' is relative to the start of the ramblock 'rb'. When
>> it's used to access the dirty memory bitmap of ram_list (i.e.
>> ram_list.dirty_memory
Haozhong Zhang wrote:
> In cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(rb, start, ...), the 2nd
> argument 'start' is relative to the start of the ramblock 'rb'. When
> it's used to access the dirty memory bitmap of ram_list (i.e.
> ram_list.dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_MIGRATION]->blocks[]), an offset to
In cpu_physical_memory_sync_dirty_bitmap(rb, start, ...), the 2nd
argument 'start' is relative to the start of the ramblock 'rb'. When
it's used to access the dirty memory bitmap of ram_list (i.e.
ram_list.dirty_memory[DIRTY_MEMORY_MIGRATION]->blocks[]), an offset to
the start of all RAM (i.e. rb->
