On 05/07/2013 03:24 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 7 May 2013 13:52, Andre Przywara wrote:
On 05/07/2013 02:44 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
I'm not entirely sure I understand why we need change.
Have upstream really introduced a breaking change for
everybody who uses libfdt, or are we using it wrongl
On 7 May 2013 13:52, Andre Przywara wrote:
> On 05/07/2013 02:44 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> I'm not entirely sure I understand why we need change.
>> Have upstream really introduced a breaking change for
>> everybody who uses libfdt, or are we using it wrongly?
>
>
> Everybody who copies and chan
On 05/07/2013 02:44 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 7 May 2013 13:36, Andre Przywara wrote:
Upstream dtc.git introduced a change in libfdt_env.h, which breaks
compilation with QEMU's version of it:
CC arm-softmmu/device_tree.o
In file included from /usr/include/libfdt.h:55:0,
On 7 May 2013 13:36, Andre Przywara wrote:
> Upstream dtc.git introduced a change in libfdt_env.h, which breaks
> compilation with QEMU's version of it:
>
> CC arm-softmmu/device_tree.o
> In file included from /usr/include/libfdt.h:55:0,
> from /src/qemu.git/device_tree.c:28:
>
Upstream dtc.git introduced a change in libfdt_env.h, which breaks
compilation with QEMU's version of it:
CC arm-softmmu/device_tree.o
In file included from /usr/include/libfdt.h:55:0,
from /src/qemu.git/device_tree.c:28:
/usr/include/fdt.h:7:2: error: unknown type name 'fdt32_t
