On 29.05.14 13:05, Peter Maydell wrote:
Fix a typo in the ppce500_pci vmstate definition which meant that
we were migrating the struct pci_inbound using the vmstate for
pci_outbound. Fortunately the two structures have exactly the same
format at the moment (four uint32_ts) so this was harmless,
On 30 May 2014 09:19, Alexander Graf ag...@suse.de wrote:
Ouch. I'm fairly sure we don't have migration users on e500,
so we're safe. Thanks a lot for catching this!
Thank clang 3.4, which noticed that the vmstate_pci_inbound
variable was never used...
-- PMM
Fix a typo in the ppce500_pci vmstate definition which meant that
we were migrating the struct pci_inbound using the vmstate for
pci_outbound. Fortunately the two structures have exactly the same
format at the moment (four uint32_ts) so this was harmless, and
we can correcting the typo without a
