On 16.05.19 18:11, Max Reitz wrote:
> In 219, we wait for the job to make progress before we emit its status.
> This makes the output reliable.
>
> Unfortunately, there is a bug: We do not wait for any more progress if
> the job has already reached its total-progress. Right after the job has
> be
On 16.05.19 18:11, Max Reitz wrote:
> In 219, we wait for the job to make progress before we emit its status.
> This makes the output reliable.
>
> Unfortunately, there is a bug: We do not wait for any more progress if
> the job has already reached its total-progress. Right after the job has
> be
In 219, we wait for the job to make progress before we emit its status.
This makes the output reliable.
Unfortunately, there is a bug: We do not wait for any more progress if
the job has already reached its total-progress. Right after the job has
been started, it is possible that total-progress i
