On 13/06/2018 04:15, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>
>
> On 2018/6/12 20:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 16/05/2018 11:18, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>>> According to KVM commit 75d61fbc, it needs to delete the slot before
>>> changing the KVM_MEM_READONLY flag. But QEMU commit 235e8982 only check
>>> whether
On 2018/6/12 20:17, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> On 16/05/2018 11:18, Shannon Zhao wrote:
>> According to KVM commit 75d61fbc, it needs to delete the slot before
>> changing the KVM_MEM_READONLY flag. But QEMU commit 235e8982 only check
>> whether KVM_MEM_READONLY flag is set instead of changing. It
On 16/05/2018 11:18, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> According to KVM commit 75d61fbc, it needs to delete the slot before
> changing the KVM_MEM_READONLY flag. But QEMU commit 235e8982 only check
> whether KVM_MEM_READONLY flag is set instead of changing. It doesn't
> need to delete the slot if the
Ping?
On 2018/5/16 17:18, Shannon Zhao wrote:
> According to KVM commit 75d61fbc, it needs to delete the slot before
> changing the KVM_MEM_READONLY flag. But QEMU commit 235e8982 only check
> whether KVM_MEM_READONLY flag is set instead of changing. It doesn't
> need to delete the slot if the
According to KVM commit 75d61fbc, it needs to delete the slot before
changing the KVM_MEM_READONLY flag. But QEMU commit 235e8982 only check
whether KVM_MEM_READONLY flag is set instead of changing. It doesn't
need to delete the slot if the KVM_MEM_READONLY flag is not changed.
This fixes a issue
