On Wed, Sep 18, 2013 at 01:04:01PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 09/05/2013 04:07 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> > Il 05/09/2013 05:16, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
> >> Sorry for my ignorance, but this is The Kernel, it is already there,
> >> broken
> >> or not, even if it i
On 09/05/2013 04:07 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 05/09/2013 05:16, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>> Sorry for my ignorance, but this is The Kernel, it is already there,
>> broken
>> or not, even if it is broken, qemu cannot stay isolated, no?
>> This is a mechanical change, no
Il 03/09/2013 10:27, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy
> ---
>
> I need this update as VFIO on PPC64/pseries got in upstream kernel
> and this is required by VFIO-SPAPR bits in QEMU. Others may find this
> update useful too :)
>
> ---
> linux-headers/asm-arm
Il 05/09/2013 05:16, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>>> >> Sorry for my ignorance, but this is The Kernel, it is already there,
>>> >> broken
>>> >> or not, even if it is broken, qemu cannot stay isolated, no?
>>> >> This is a mechanical change, no more.
>> >
>> > It's a matter of keeping thing
On 09/04/2013 01:35 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 03/09/2013 17:28, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
>> On 09/03/2013 08:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> On 2013-09-03 11:32, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 09/03/2013 07:29 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 3 September 2013 09:27, Alexey Kardashevs
Il 03/09/2013 17:28, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
> On 09/03/2013 08:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> On 2013-09-03 11:32, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> On 09/03/2013 07:29 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 3 September 2013 09:27, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevsk
On Wed, 2013-09-04 at 01:47 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 09/04/2013 01:34 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 3 September 2013 16:28, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >> On 09/03/2013 08:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> >>> This shouldn't be routed through trivial in general as things broke too
> >>
On Tue, 2013-09-03 at 17:03 +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 3 September 2013 16:58, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > I was under the impression that we were only ever updating linux-headers
> > from mainline, never from kvm-next.
>
> Looking at the git history, it's variable. Four of the
> last 10 upd
On 3 September 2013 16:28, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 09/03/2013 08:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>> This shouldn't be routed through trivial in general as things broke too
>> often in this area.
>
>
> Sorry for my ignorance, but this is The Kernel, it is already there, broken
> or not, even if i
On 09/04/2013 01:34 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 3 September 2013 16:28, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 09/03/2013 08:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
>>> This shouldn't be routed through trivial in general as things broke too
>>> often in this area.
>>
>>
>> Sorry for my ignorance, but this is The Ke
On 3 September 2013 16:58, Alex Williamson wrote:
> I was under the impression that we were only ever updating linux-headers
> from mainline, never from kvm-next.
Looking at the git history, it's variable. Four of the
last 10 updates were from somewhere other than mainline.
In any case this is th
On 09/03/2013 08:42 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote:
> On 2013-09-03 11:32, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 09/03/2013 07:29 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>>> On 3 September 2013 09:27, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy
---
I need this update as VFIO on PPC64/p
On 3 September 2013 16:47, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 09/04/2013 01:34 AM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> The classic way for things to break is that a header
>> update accidentally reverts something (because a
>> previous update was from kvm-next and this one is
>> from mainline, for example). Acc
On 2013-09-03 11:32, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 09/03/2013 07:29 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 3 September 2013 09:27, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy
>>> ---
>>>
>>> I need this update as VFIO on PPC64/pseries got in upstream kernel
>>> and this is requ
On 09/03/2013 07:29 PM, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 3 September 2013 09:27, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy
>> ---
>>
>> I need this update as VFIO on PPC64/pseries got in upstream kernel
>> and this is required by VFIO-SPAPR bits in QEMU. Others may find this
>>
On 3 September 2013 09:27, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy
> ---
>
> I need this update as VFIO on PPC64/pseries got in upstream kernel
> and this is required by VFIO-SPAPR bits in QEMU. Others may find this
> update useful too :)
> ---
> linux-headers/asm-arm64
Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy
---
I need this update as VFIO on PPC64/pseries got in upstream kernel
and this is required by VFIO-SPAPR bits in QEMU. Others may find this
update useful too :)
---
linux-headers/asm-arm64/kvm.h | 168
linux-headers
17 matches
Mail list logo
