Le 23/01/2018 à 11:26, Andreas Schwab a écrit :
> On Jan 23 2018, Laurent Vivier wrote:
>
>> And, please, test it (build/run).
>
> This was tested by bootstrapping openSUSE Factory for RISC-V.
I have no doubt on this part, but you should test the "#else" part too,
by, for
On Jan 23 2018, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> And, please, test it (build/run).
This was tested by bootstrapping openSUSE Factory for RISC-V.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab, SUSE Labs, sch...@suse.de
GPG Key fingerprint = 0196 BAD8 1CE9 1970 F4BE 1748 E4D4 88E3 0EEA B9D7
"And now
On Jan 23 2018, Laurent Vivier wrote:
> Please fix style problem reported by patchew
> (or ./scripts/checkpatch.pl)
This was mostly copy-pasted from surrounding code. :-)
>> @@ -8342,6 +8359,22 @@ abi_long do_syscall(void *cpu_env, int num, abi_long
>> arg1,
>> }
Le 22/01/2018 à 18:44, Andreas Schwab a écrit :
> This is needed for new architectures like RISC-V which do not provide any
> other rename-like syscall.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab
> ---
> linux-user/syscall.c | 33 +
> 1 file changed, 33
Le 22/01/2018 à 18:44, Andreas Schwab a écrit :
> This is needed for new architectures like RISC-V which do not provide any
> other rename-like syscall.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab
> ---
> linux-user/syscall.c | 33 +
> 1 file changed, 33
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Type: series
Message-id: mvmk1w9lreq@suse.de
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: implement renameat2
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash
BASE=base
n=1
total=$(git log --oneline $BASE
This is needed for new architectures like RISC-V which do not provide any
other rename-like syscall.
Signed-off-by: Andreas Schwab
---
linux-user/syscall.c | 33 +
1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c
Hi,
This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for
more information:
Type: series
Message-id: 20171220002941.14560-1-pal...@dabbelt.com
Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: Implement renameat2 when defined
=== TEST SCRIPT BEGIN ===
#!/bin/bash
BASE=base
n=1
On Thu, 21 Dec 2017 06:01:25 PST (-0800), peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 20 December 2017 at 00:29, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
+#if defined(TARGET_NR_renameat2) && defined(__NR_renameat2)
+case TARGET_NR_renameat2:
+{
+void *p2;
+p =
On 20 December 2017 at 00:29, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> +#if defined(TARGET_NR_renameat2) && defined(__NR_renameat2)
> +case TARGET_NR_renameat2:
> +{
> +void *p2;
> +p = lock_user_string(arg2);
> +p2 = lock_user_string(arg4);
> +
On 12/20/2017 01:29 AM, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> From: Palmer Dabbelt
>
> The RISC-V Linux port was recently accept upstream and will be released
> as part of 4.15. While working on our glibc port I discovered that
> qemu's user-mode emulation doesn't support renameat2, which
From: Palmer Dabbelt
The RISC-V Linux port was recently accept upstream and will be released
as part of 4.15. While working on our glibc port I discovered that
qemu's user-mode emulation doesn't support renameat2, which has replaced
rename as part of the default system call
12 matches
Mail list logo