On Wed, 6 Feb 2019 23:55:15 +
Wei Yang wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 12:59:49PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> >On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 09:08:37 +0800
> >Wei Yang wrote:
> >
> >> [get|set]_addr are two counterpart to access PCDIMMDevice.addr.
> >>
> >> Since we have already set up a property
On Wed, Feb 06, 2019 at 12:59:49PM +0100, Igor Mammedov wrote:
>On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 09:08:37 +0800
>Wei Yang wrote:
>
>> [get|set]_addr are two counterpart to access PCDIMMDevice.addr.
>>
>> Since we have already set up a property PC_DIMM_ADDR_PROP for this
>> field and use this mechanism in
On Fri, 1 Feb 2019 09:08:37 +0800
Wei Yang wrote:
> [get|set]_addr are two counterpart to access PCDIMMDevice.addr.
>
> Since we have already set up a property PC_DIMM_ADDR_PROP for this
> field and use this mechanism in set_addr, it would be more proper to use
> the same mechanism in
[get|set]_addr are two counterpart to access PCDIMMDevice.addr.
Since we have already set up a property PC_DIMM_ADDR_PROP for this
field and use this mechanism in set_addr, it would be more proper to use
the same mechanism in set_addr.
This patch uses object_property_get_uint() to replace the
