Am 23.04.2012 20:30, schrieb Marcelo Tosatti:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 02:33:49PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Am 23.04.2012 01:35, schrieb Marcelo Tosatti:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 08:18:49PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 03:56:01PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Refcount block
Am 23.04.2012 01:35, schrieb Marcelo Tosatti:
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 08:18:49PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 03:56:01PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Refcount block allocation and refcount table growth rely on
s-free_cluster_index pointing to somewhere after the current
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 03:56:01PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Refcount block allocation and refcount table growth rely on
s-free_cluster_index pointing to somewhere after the current
allocation. Change qcow2_allocate_cluster_at() to fulfill this
assumption.
Without this change it could happen
On Sun, Apr 22, 2012 at 08:18:49PM -0300, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 03:56:01PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote:
Refcount block allocation and refcount table growth rely on
s-free_cluster_index pointing to somewhere after the current
allocation. Change
Refcount block allocation and refcount table growth rely on
s-free_cluster_index pointing to somewhere after the current
allocation. Change qcow2_allocate_cluster_at() to fulfill this
assumption.
Without this change it could happen that a newly allocated refcount
block and the allocated data
