On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 01:40:59PM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年06月13日 12:24, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
> > On 6/12/2018 7:38 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 2018年06月12日 19:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 10:29:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
On 2018年06月13日 12:24, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
On 6/12/2018 7:38 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年06月12日 19:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 10:29:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年06月05日 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I don't think this is sufficient.
If both
On 6/12/2018 7:38 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年06月12日 19:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 10:29:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年06月05日 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I don't think this is sufficient.
If both primary and standby devices are present, a legacy
On 2018年06月13日 08:20, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
On 6/12/2018 4:54 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 10:29:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年06月05日 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I don't think this is sufficient.
If both primary and standby devices are present, a
On 2018年06月12日 19:54, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 10:29:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年06月05日 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I don't think this is sufficient.
If both primary and standby devices are present, a legacy guest without
support for the feature
On 6/12/2018 4:54 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 10:29:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年06月05日 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I don't think this is sufficient.
If both primary and standby devices are present, a legacy guest without
support for the feature might
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 10:29:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年06月05日 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > I don't think this is sufficient.
> >
> > If both primary and standby devices are present, a legacy guest without
> > support for the feature might see two devices with same mac
On Mon, Jun 11, 2018 at 10:02:45PM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
> On 6/11/2018 7:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 09:54:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> > >
> > > On 2018年06月12日 01:26, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:09:54PM -0700,
On 6/11/2018 7:17 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 09:54:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年06月12日 01:26, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:09:54PM -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 09:54:44AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 2018年06月12日 01:26, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:09:54PM -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
> > > This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net device
> > > to
> > > act as a standby
On 2018年06月12日 01:26, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:09:54PM -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net device to
act as a standby for another device with the same MAC address.
I tested this with a small change to
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 04:09:54PM -0700, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
> This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net device to
> act as a standby for another device with the same MAC address.
>
> I tested this with a small change to the patch to mark the STANDBY feature
>
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 11:17:36AM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
> On 6/4/2018 7:06 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 2018年06月05日 09:41, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
> > > Ping on this patch now that the kernel patches are accepted into
> > > davem's net-next tree.
> > >
On 6/4/2018 7:06 PM, Jason Wang wrote:
On 2018年06月05日 09:41, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
Ping on this patch now that the kernel patches are accepted into
davem's net-next tree.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/920005/
On 5/7/2018 4:09 PM, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
This feature bit can be
On 2018年06月05日 20:33, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I don't think this is sufficient.
If both primary and standby devices are present, a legacy guest without
support for the feature might see two devices with same mac and get
confused.
I think that we should only make primary visible after
On Tue, Jun 05, 2018 at 01:20:33PM -0700, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
>
> On 6/5/2018 5:33 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > I don't think this is sufficient.
>
> Sure. This is not sufficient for a complete solution, but is Qemu the right
> place
> to manage primary/standby interfaces?
>
> I
On 6/5/2018 5:33 AM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
I don't think this is sufficient.
Sure. This is not sufficient for a complete solution, but is Qemu the right
place
to manage primary/standby interfaces?
I think the other steps including plugging/unplugging the primary interface
needs
to
I don't think this is sufficient.
If both primary and standby devices are present, a legacy guest without
support for the feature might see two devices with same mac and get
confused.
I think that we should only make primary visible after guest acked the
backup feature bit.
And on reset or when
On 2018年06月05日 09:41, Samudrala, Sridhar wrote:
Ping on this patch now that the kernel patches are accepted into
davem's net-next tree.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/920005/
On 5/7/2018 4:09 PM, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net
Ping on this patch now that the kernel patches are accepted into davem's
net-next tree.
https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/cover/920005/
On 5/7/2018 4:09 PM, Sridhar Samudrala wrote:
This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net device to
act as a standby for another device with
This feature bit can be used by hypervisor to indicate virtio_net device to
act as a standby for another device with the same MAC address.
I tested this with a small change to the patch to mark the STANDBY feature
'true'
by default as i am using libvirt to start the VMs.
Is there a way to pass
21 matches
Mail list logo
