Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ram: Split dirty bitmap by RAMBlock

2017-04-26 Thread no-reply
Hi, This series seems to have some coding style problems. See output below for more information: Message-id: 20170426073247.7441-2-quint...@redhat.com Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ram: Split dirty bitmap by RAMBlock Type: series === TEST SCRIPT BEGIN === #!/bin/bash BASE=base n=1 total=$(git

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ram: Split dirty bitmap by RAMBlock

2017-04-26 Thread Juan Quintela
Hailiang Zhang wrote: > On 2017/4/26 15:32, Juan Quintela wrote: >> Both the ram bitmap and the unsent bitmap are split by RAMBlock. >> >> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela >> >> -- >> >> Fix compilation when DEBUG_POSTCOPY is enabled (thanks

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ram: Split dirty bitmap by RAMBlock

2017-04-26 Thread Peter Xu
On Wed, Apr 26, 2017 at 09:32:47AM +0200, Juan Quintela wrote: > Both the ram bitmap and the unsent bitmap are split by RAMBlock. > > Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela Reviewed-by: Peter Xu -- Peter Xu

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ram: Split dirty bitmap by RAMBlock

2017-04-26 Thread Hailiang Zhang
On 2017/4/26 15:32, Juan Quintela wrote: Both the ram bitmap and the unsent bitmap are split by RAMBlock. Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela -- Fix compilation when DEBUG_POSTCOPY is enabled (thanks Hailiang) Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela ---

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ram: Split dirty bitmap by RAMBlock

2017-04-26 Thread Juan Quintela
Both the ram bitmap and the unsent bitmap are split by RAMBlock. Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela -- Fix compilation when DEBUG_POSTCOPY is enabled (thanks Hailiang) Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela --- include/exec/ram_addr.h | 13 +-

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ram: Split dirty bitmap by RAMBlock

2017-04-25 Thread Juan Quintela
Hailiang Zhang wrote: > On 2017/4/25 18:11, Juan Quintela wrote: >> Both the ram bitmap and the unsent bitmap are split by RAMBlock. >> >> Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela >> --- >> include/exec/ram_addr.h | 13 +- >>

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ram: Split dirty bitmap by RAMBlock

2017-04-25 Thread Hailiang Zhang
On 2017/4/25 18:11, Juan Quintela wrote: Both the ram bitmap and the unsent bitmap are split by RAMBlock. Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela --- include/exec/ram_addr.h | 13 +- include/migration/postcopy-ram.h | 3 - migration/postcopy-ram.c | 5 +-

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ram: Split dirty bitmap by RAMBlock

2017-04-25 Thread Juan Quintela
Both the ram bitmap and the unsent bitmap are split by RAMBlock. Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela --- include/exec/ram_addr.h | 13 +- include/migration/postcopy-ram.h | 3 - migration/postcopy-ram.c | 5 +- migration/ram.c | 257

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ram: Split dirty bitmap by RAMBlock

2017-04-20 Thread Dr. David Alan Gilbert
* Juan Quintela (quint...@redhat.com) wrote: > Both the ram bitmap and the unsent bitmap are split by RAMBlock. > > Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela > --- > include/exec/ram_addr.h | 13 ++- > include/migration/postcopy-ram.h | 3 - > migration/postcopy-ram.c

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ram: Split dirty bitmap by RAMBlock

2017-04-19 Thread Juan Quintela
Both the ram bitmap and the unsent bitmap are split by RAMBlock. Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela --- include/exec/ram_addr.h | 13 ++- include/migration/postcopy-ram.h | 3 - migration/postcopy-ram.c | 5 +- migration/ram.c | 215

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] ram: Split dirty bitmap by RAMBlock

2017-03-23 Thread Juan Quintela
Both the ram bitmap and the unsent bitmap are split by RAMBlock. Signed-off-by: Juan Quintela --- include/exec/ram_addr.h | 13 +++- migration/ram.c | 201 ++-- 2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 129 deletions(-) diff