On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 05:23:11PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
Correct the argument and return types for the float-int conversion helper
functions so that integer arguments and return values are declared as
uint32_t/uint64_t, not float32/float64. This allows us to remove the
hand-rolled
On 21 March 2011 13:48, Nathan Froyd froy...@codesourcery.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 05:23:11PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
Correct the argument and return types for the float-int conversion helper
functions so that integer arguments and return values are declared as
uint32_t/uint64_t,
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 02:04:31PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
On 21 March 2011 13:48, Nathan Froyd froy...@codesourcery.com wrote:
I like the direction this patch goes; you aren't by any chance going to
convert the passing/returning of float* to their appropriate int* types
too, are you?
On 21 March 2011 14:09, Nathan Froyd froy...@codesourcery.com wrote:
I'm just concerned about what would happen if we turned on softfloat's
float types are structure types bit; I'm pretty sure everything would
break horribly on targets that don't pass small structures in
registers.
Correct the argument and return types for the float-int conversion helper
functions so that integer arguments and return values are declared as
uint32_t/uint64_t, not float32/float64. This allows us to remove the
hand-rolled functions which were doing bitwise copies between the types
via unions.
