On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Catalin Patulea catal...@google.com wrote:
FPREM1 now passes the TestFloat floatx80_rem suite (and FPREM is implemented
very
similarly).
The code (the bulk of which is remainder_kernel and do_fprem) is derived from
Bochs SVN revision 11224 dated 2012-06-21
On 2 July 2012 16:25, Catalin Patulea catal...@google.com wrote:
FPREM1 now passes the TestFloat floatx80_rem suite (and FPREM is implemented
very
similarly).
The code (the bulk of which is remainder_kernel and do_fprem) is derived from
Bochs SVN revision 11224 dated 2012-06-21 10:33:37
On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 9:13 AM, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Please run scripts/checkpatch.pl for CODING_STYLE issues, I spotted one
slightly misplaced if brace, and one empty line at the bottom seemed to
have indentation (git-am complains about that, too).
Done. The only issue left
FPREM1 now passes the TestFloat floatx80_rem suite (and FPREM is implemented
very
similarly).
The code (the bulk of which is remainder_kernel and do_fprem) is derived from
Bochs SVN revision 11224 dated 2012-06-21 10:33:37 -0700, with conversions to
Qemu type aliases, C features only, etc. as
On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 11:25 AM, Catalin Patulea catal...@google.com wrote:
FPREM1 now passes the TestFloat floatx80_rem suite (and FPREM is implemented
very
similarly).
The code (the bulk of which is remainder_kernel and do_fprem) is derived from
Bochs SVN revision 11224 dated 2012-06-21
On 29 June 2012 02:50, Catalin Patulea catal...@google.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org
wrote:
No new code should be using the uint64 c types (which are
at least NN bits wide) -- uint64_t or uint_fast64_t please.
Ok, changed some {int - flag}
Am 28.06.2012 01:00, schrieb Catalin Patulea:
Hey guys,
I've been hacking up the FPREM and FPREM1 i386 instructions (without KVM) to
be implemented using SoftFloat only. This was motivated by some correctness
issues
that we noticed with the current implementation which follows the AMD
On 29 June 2012 14:13, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Am 28.06.2012 01:00, schrieb Catalin Patulea:
/*
+| Returns 1 if the extended double-precision floating-point value `a' is an
+| unsupported; otherwise
On 28 June 2012 00:00, Catalin Patulea catal...@google.com wrote:
Hey guys,
I've been hacking up the FPREM and FPREM1 i386 instructions (without KVM) to
be implemented using SoftFloat only. This was motivated by some correctness
issues
that we noticed with the current implementation which
On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 2:25 PM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
/*
+| Returns 1 if the extended double-precision floating-point value `a' is an
+| unsupported; otherwise returns 0.
an unsupported
Hey guys,
I've been hacking up the FPREM and FPREM1 i386 instructions (without KVM) to be
implemented using SoftFloat only. This was motivated by some correctness issues
that we noticed with the current implementation which follows the AMD
datasheet.I believe the datasheet explains the
Am 28.06.2012 01:00, schrieb Catalin Patulea:
Hey guys,
I've been hacking up the FPREM and FPREM1 i386 instructions (without KVM) to be
implemented using SoftFloat only. This was motivated by some correctness issues
that we noticed with the current implementation which follows the AMD
12 matches
Mail list logo
