Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] v9fs_walk: As per 9p2000 RFC, MAXWELEM >= nwnames >= 0.

2011-03-21 Thread Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
On 3/21/2011 2:34 PM, Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV) wrote: > On 3/21/2011 2:16 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: >> On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Harsh Prateek Bora >> wrote: >>> The nwnames field in TWALK message is assumed to be >=0 and <= MAXWELEM >>> which is defined as macro P9_MAXWELEM (16) in vi

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] v9fs_walk: As per 9p2000 RFC, MAXWELEM >= nwnames >= 0.

2011-03-21 Thread Venkateswararao Jujjuri (JV)
On 3/21/2011 2:16 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Harsh Prateek Bora > wrote: >> The nwnames field in TWALK message is assumed to be >=0 and <= MAXWELEM >> which is defined as macro P9_MAXWELEM (16) in virtio-9p.h as per 9p2000 RFC. >> Appropriate changes are required

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] v9fs_walk: As per 9p2000 RFC, MAXWELEM >= nwnames >= 0.

2011-03-21 Thread Stefan Hajnoczi
On Mon, Mar 21, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Harsh Prateek Bora wrote: > The nwnames field in TWALK message is assumed to be >=0 and <= MAXWELEM > which is defined as macro P9_MAXWELEM (16) in virtio-9p.h as per 9p2000 RFC. > Appropriate changes are required in V9fsWalkState and v9fs_walk. > > Signed-off-by:

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH] v9fs_walk: As per 9p2000 RFC, MAXWELEM >= nwnames >= 0.

2011-03-21 Thread Harsh Prateek Bora
The nwnames field in TWALK message is assumed to be >=0 and <= MAXWELEM which is defined as macro P9_MAXWELEM (16) in virtio-9p.h as per 9p2000 RFC. Appropriate changes are required in V9fsWalkState and v9fs_walk. Signed-off-by: Harsh Prateek Bora --- hw/9pfs/virtio-9p.c |5 - hw/9pfs/vi