Jan, Alex, ping?
On 12/07/12 15:47, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 12/07/12 15:29, Alex Williamson wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 14:58 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>>> On 12/07/12 14:43, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 14:38 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On
On 12/07/12 15:29, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 14:58 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 12/07/12 14:43, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 14:38 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 12/07/12 14:31, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 14:16
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 14:58 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 12/07/12 14:43, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 14:38 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >> On 12/07/12 14:31, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >>> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 14:16 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On
On 12/07/12 14:43, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 14:38 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 12/07/12 14:31, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 14:16 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 12/07/12 12:54, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 12:25
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 14:38 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 12/07/12 14:31, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 14:16 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >> On 12/07/12 12:54, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >>> On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 12:25 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On
On 12/07/12 14:31, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 14:16 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 12/07/12 12:54, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 12:25 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
On 11/07/12 02:57, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:51
On Thu, 2012-07-12 at 14:16 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 12/07/12 12:54, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 12:25 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >> On 11/07/12 02:57, Alex Williamson wrote:
> >>> On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:51 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> Th
On 12/07/12 12:54, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 12:25 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> On 11/07/12 02:57, Alex Williamson wrote:
>>> On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:51 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
The two patches in this set are supposed to add VFIO support for POWER.
>>>
On Wed, 2012-07-11 at 12:25 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> On 11/07/12 02:57, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:51 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> >> The two patches in this set are supposed to add VFIO support for POWER.
> >>
> >> The first one adds one more step in th
On 11/07/12 02:57, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:51 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
>> The two patches in this set are supposed to add VFIO support for POWER.
>>
>> The first one adds one more step in the initalizaion sequence which I am not
>> sure is correct.
>>
>> The seco
On Tue, 2012-07-10 at 15:51 +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> The two patches in this set are supposed to add VFIO support for POWER.
>
> The first one adds one more step in the initalizaion sequence which I am not
> sure is correct.
>
> The second patch adds actual VFIO support. It is not rea
The two patches in this set are supposed to add VFIO support for POWER.
The first one adds one more step in the initalizaion sequence which I am not
sure is correct.
The second patch adds actual VFIO support. It is not ready to submit but
ready to discuss. I would like to get rid of all #ifdef TA
12 matches
Mail list logo