On Thu, Sep 27, 2012 at 07:53:47AM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
Hi,
Understood, but I'd really prefer a file in docs/. We should be
rigorous about having formal specs for all of our paravirtual devices.
The code shouldn't be the spec.
Well, pci-serial and pci-bridge are *not*
On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 08:01:39AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com writes:
On 09/26/12 01:43, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com writes:
Hi,
Two patches, first split up serial.c a bit,
then actually add the pci-based serial
Hi,
For pci-serial windows needs a driver (which is just a inf file, the
driver itself is shipped by windows). So in that case it is easier to
go with our own ids I think, as we can simply ship a inf file then.
When picking the IDs of other cards, existing as real hardware, users
would
On 09/26/12 01:43, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com writes:
Hi,
Two patches, first split up serial.c a bit,
then actually add the pci-based serial device.
The series looks good to me. A couple requests:
1) Could you add a spec describing this new PCI device?
Hi,
The only reason I ask is whether this is something we can add
new features to. I can't think of one off hand, but it can't
hurt to work this out up front.
Multiport e.g. (to save PCI slots). There was some proposal
recently to add a model of an real multiport PCI card, just don't
Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com writes:
On 09/26/12 01:43, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com writes:
Hi,
Two patches, first split up serial.c a bit,
then actually add the pci-based serial device.
The series looks good to me. A couple requests:
1) Could you
Hi,
Understood, but I'd really prefer a file in docs/. We should be
rigorous about having formal specs for all of our paravirtual devices.
The code shouldn't be the spec.
Well, pci-serial and pci-bridge are *not* paravirtual devices.
They follow a specification describing the programming
Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com writes:
Hi,
Two patches, first split up serial.c a bit,
then actually add the pci-based serial device.
The series looks good to me. A couple requests:
1) Could you add a spec describing this new PCI device? Doesn't need to
be more than a couple
On 2012-09-26 01:43, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Gerd Hoffmann kra...@redhat.com writes:
Hi,
Two patches, first split up serial.c a bit,
then actually add the pci-based serial device.
The series looks good to me. A couple requests:
1) Could you add a spec describing this new PCI device?
Hi,
Two patches, first split up serial.c a bit,
then actually add the pci-based serial device.
cheers,
Gerd
Gerd Hoffmann (2):
serial: split serial.c
serial: add pci variant
default-configs/pci.mak |2 +
docs/pciserial.inf | 96 +++
10 matches
Mail list logo