On Thu, Mar 17, 2016 at 09:37:56AM +0200, Sameeh Jubran wrote:
> This patch series introduces an upper bound for the number of interrupts
> per second. This feature is supported by the real hardware, however up
> until now it wasn't implemented in e1000. This feature is very
> significant, it can
You're welcome Jason.
Dear Denis,
The policy with e1000 was to keep it as much as possible to the real
Hardware, That's why I think we should keep it 500 even though 250 pushes
the performance to the limit.
Jason what do you think about that?
On Fri, Mar 18, 2016 at 3:34 AM, Jason Wang
On 03/17/2016 03:37 PM, Sameeh Jubran wrote:
> This patch series introduces an upper bound for the number of interrupts
> per second. This feature is supported by the real hardware, however up
> until now it wasn't implemented in e1000. This feature is very
> significant, it can prevent an
This patch series introduces an upper bound for the number of interrupts
per second. This feature is supported by the real hardware, however up
until now it wasn't implemented in e1000. This feature is very
significant, it can prevent an interrupt storm by giving the driver
a bounded
On 03/17/2016 10:37 AM, Sameeh Jubran wrote:
This patch series introduces an upper bound for the number of interrupts
per second. This feature is supported by the real hardware, however up
until now it wasn't implemented in e1000. This feature is very
significant, it can prevent an interrupt
