On Mon, Jul 24, 2017 at 07:32:29PM +0300, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
> Denis V Lunev writes:
>
> > On 07/24/2017 05:43 PM, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
> >> Denis V Lunev writes:
> >>
> >>> On 07/24/2017 02:34 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 05:31:47PM +0300, Vladimir
Denis V Lunev writes:
> On 07/24/2017 05:43 PM, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
>> Denis V Lunev writes:
>>
>>> On 07/24/2017 02:34 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 05:31:47PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
wrote:
> Current trace system have a drawback: parameters of
On 07/24/2017 09:17 AM, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
On 07/24/2017 02:34 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 05:31:47PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
Current trace system have a drawback: parameters of trace functions
are calculated even if corresponding tracepoint is
On 07/24/2017 05:43 PM, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
> Denis V Lunev writes:
>
>> On 07/24/2017 02:34 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 05:31:47PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
>>> wrote:
Current trace system have a drawback: parameters of trace functions
are
Denis V Lunev writes:
> On 07/24/2017 02:34 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 05:31:47PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>>> Current trace system have a drawback: parameters of trace functions
>>> are calculated even if corresponding tracepoint is disabled. Also, it
On 07/24/2017 02:34 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 05:31:47PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
>> Current trace system have a drawback: parameters of trace functions
>> are calculated even if corresponding tracepoint is disabled. Also, it
>> looks like trace
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 05:31:47PM +0300, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> Current trace system have a drawback: parameters of trace functions
> are calculated even if corresponding tracepoint is disabled. Also, it
> looks like trace function are not actually inlined by compiler (at
> least
On Fri, Jul 21, 2017 at 08:04:17PM +0300, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
>
> > Current trace system have a drawback: parameters of trace functions
> > are calculated even if corresponding tracepoint is disabled. Also, it
> > looks like trace function are not actually
On 07/24/2017 02:07 PM, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
>
>> 21.07.2017 20:04, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
>>> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
>>>
Current trace system have a drawback: parameters of trace functions
are calculated even if corresponding
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
> 21.07.2017 20:04, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
>> Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
>>
>>> Current trace system have a drawback: parameters of trace functions
>>> are calculated even if corresponding tracepoint is disabled. Also, it
>>> looks like trace
21.07.2017 20:04, Lluís Vilanova wrote:
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
Current trace system have a drawback: parameters of trace functions
are calculated even if corresponding tracepoint is disabled. Also, it
looks like trace function are not actually inlined by compiler (at
least for
Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy writes:
> Current trace system have a drawback: parameters of trace functions
> are calculated even if corresponding tracepoint is disabled. Also, it
> looks like trace function are not actually inlined by compiler (at
> least for me).
> Here is a fix proposal: move
Current trace system have a drawback: parameters of trace functions
are calculated even if corresponding tracepoint is disabled. Also, it
looks like trace function are not actually inlined by compiler (at
least for me).
Here is a fix proposal: move from function call to macros. Patch 02
is an
13 matches
Mail list logo