On 08/25/2014 08:33 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Il 23/08/2014 12:19, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
Libvirt is growing support for x86_64 OVMF guests:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-August/msg01045.html
An important feature of such guests is the persistent store for
non-volatile
Il 19/09/2014 08:48, Alexey Kardashevskiy ha scritto:
Right now we use NVRAM on sPAPR as:
-drive id=id3,if=none,file=qemu_nvram.img
-global spapr-nvram.drive=id3
So the NVRAM file is BlockDriverState and HMP's migrate -b copies the
content just fine.
What is missing here? Thanks.
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 12:19:05PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Libvirt is growing support for x86_64 OVMF guests:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-August/msg01045.html
An important feature of such guests is the persistent store for
non-volatile UEFI variables. This is
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 12:19:05PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Libvirt is growing support for x86_64 OVMF guests:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-August/msg01045.html
An important feature of such guests is the persistent store for
non-volatile UEFI variables. This is
On 08/27/14 10:58, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Sat, Aug 23, 2014 at 12:19:05PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Libvirt is growing support for x86_64 OVMF guests:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-August/msg01045.html
An important feature of such guests is the persistent store for
Il 23/08/2014 12:19, Laszlo Ersek ha scritto:
Libvirt is growing support for x86_64 OVMF guests:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-August/msg01045.html
An important feature of such guests is the persistent store for
non-volatile UEFI variables. This is implemented with
Libvirt is growing support for x86_64 OVMF guests:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2014-August/msg01045.html
An important feature of such guests is the persistent store for
non-volatile UEFI variables. This is implemented with if=pflash drives.
The referenced libvirt patchset sets up
