Il 01/08/2014 16:34, Stefan Hajnoczi ha scritto:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:53:01AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> diff --git a/async.c b/async.c
>> index 34af0b2..ac40eab 100644
>> --- a/async.c
>> +++ b/async.c
>> @@ -152,39 +152,43 @@ void qemu_bh_delete(QEMUBH *bh)
>> bh->deleted = 1;
>>
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 11:53:01AM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> diff --git a/async.c b/async.c
> index 34af0b2..ac40eab 100644
> --- a/async.c
> +++ b/async.c
> @@ -152,39 +152,43 @@ void qemu_bh_delete(QEMUBH *bh)
> bh->deleted = 1;
> }
>
> -static gboolean
> -aio_ctx_prepare(GSource *sou
Right now, QEMU invokes aio_bh_poll before the "poll" phase
of aio_poll. It is simpler to do it afterwards and skip the
"poll" phase altogether when the OS-dependent parts of AioContext
are invoked from GSource. This way, AioContext behaves more
similarly when used as a GSource vs. when used as s
