Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/15] sun4u: move ISABus inside of EBusState

2017-11-19 Thread Philippe Mathieu-Daudé
On 11/17/2017 10:42 AM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > Since the EBus is effectively a PCI-ISA bridge then the underlying ISA bus > should be contained within the PCI bridge itself. > > Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/15] sun4u: move ISABus inside of EBusState

2017-11-17 Thread Artyom Tarasenko
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 4:46 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > On 17/11/17 14:53, Artyom Tarasenko wrote: > >> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland >> wrote: >>> Since the EBus is effectively a PCI-ISA bridge then the

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/15] sun4u: move ISABus inside of EBusState

2017-11-17 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland
On 17/11/17 14:53, Artyom Tarasenko wrote: > On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland > wrote: >> Since the EBus is effectively a PCI-ISA bridge then the underlying ISA bus >> should be contained within the PCI bridge itself. > > While it's like that on

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/15] sun4u: move ISABus inside of EBusState

2017-11-17 Thread Artyom Tarasenko
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 2:42 PM, Mark Cave-Ayland wrote: > Since the EBus is effectively a PCI-ISA bridge then the underlying ISA bus > should be contained within the PCI bridge itself. While it's like that on the Sabre chipset, the Spitfire chipset (which I hope

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/15] sun4u: move ISABus inside of EBusState

2017-11-17 Thread Mark Cave-Ayland
Since the EBus is effectively a PCI-ISA bridge then the underlying ISA bus should be contained within the PCI bridge itself. Signed-off-by: Mark Cave-Ayland --- hw/sparc64/sun4u.c |7 +-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git