Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/17] tests: remove alt num-int cases

On 05/29/2017 10:40 PM, Fam Zheng wrote: > In-Reply-To: <20170509173559.31598-4-marcandre.lur...@redhat.com> > (=?utf-8?Q?=22Marc-Andr=C3=A9?= > Lureau"'s message of "Tue, 9 May 2017 20:35:45 +0300") > >> in-reply-to = "In-Reply-To:" 1*msg-id CRLF >> msg-id =

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/17] tests: remove alt num-int cases

I noticed you were wondering what happend to this message in the patchew thread: http://patchew.org/QEMU/20170509173559.31598-1-marcandre.lur...@redhat.com/ Markus, apparently this is because of the unusual "In-Reply-To" header of your message, which confuses patchew: In-Reply-To:

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/17] tests: remove alt num-int cases

Marc-André Lureau writes: > There are no real users of this case, and it's going to be invalid after > merging of QFloat and QInt use the same QNum type in the following patch. Invalid because our alternate code is insufficiently sophisticated. In other words

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/17] tests: remove alt num-int cases

Eric Blake writes: > On 05/09/2017 12:35 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: >> There are no real users of this case, and it's going to be invalid after >> merging of QFloat and QInt use the same QNum type in the following patch. >> >> Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau

Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/17] tests: remove alt num-int cases

On 05/09/2017 12:35 PM, Marc-André Lureau wrote: > There are no real users of this case, and it's going to be invalid after > merging of QFloat and QInt use the same QNum type in the following patch. > > Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau > --- > tests/test-keyval.c

[Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/17] tests: remove alt num-int cases

There are no real users of this case, and it's going to be invalid after merging of QFloat and QInt use the same QNum type in the following patch. Signed-off-by: Marc-André Lureau --- tests/test-keyval.c | 3 ---