On Wed, Dec 11, 2013 at 11:56 PM, Michel Pollet buser...@gmail.com wrote:
This implements just enough of the digctl IO block to allow
linux to believe it's running on (currently only) an imx23.
Signed-off-by: Michel Pollet buser...@gmail.com
---
hw/arm/Makefile.objs | 1 +
On Thu, Jan 9, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 8 January 2014 18:39, M P buser...@gmail.com wrote:
I will re-add the trace for both write and read and see if I can narrow the
range down; it will be linux specific, tho, that's why I thought a
'catchall' block
On 6 January 2014 15:46, Peter Maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
On 11 December 2013 13:56, Michel Pollet buser...@gmail.com wrote:
This implements just enough of the digctl IO block to allow
linux to believe it's running on (currently only) an imx23.
Signed-off-by: Michel Pollet
On 8 January 2014 18:39, M P buser...@gmail.com wrote:
I will re-add the trace for both write and read and see if I can narrow the
range down; it will be linux specific, tho, that's why I thought a
'catchall' block was more appropriate.
Well, we should be implementing what the hardware does,
On 11 December 2013 13:56, Michel Pollet buser...@gmail.com wrote:
This implements just enough of the digctl IO block to allow
linux to believe it's running on (currently only) an imx23.
Signed-off-by: Michel Pollet buser...@gmail.com
---
hw/arm/Makefile.objs | 1 +
This implements just enough of the digctl IO block to allow
linux to believe it's running on (currently only) an imx23.
Signed-off-by: Michel Pollet buser...@gmail.com
---
hw/arm/Makefile.objs | 1 +
hw/arm/imx23_digctl.c | 110 ++
2 files
