Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:32:52AM +0200, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Jes Sorensen jes.soren...@redhat.com
Add -version-simple argument for QEMU, printing just the version
number, without any supporting text.
This makes it simpler
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:42:57AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:32:52AM +0200, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Jes Sorensen jes.soren...@redhat.com
Add -version-simple argument for QEMU, printing just the
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com writes:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:42:57AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com writes:
[...]
It would also be nice to avoid having to parse the -help output to
determine
ARGV supported too. I wonder if it would be
On 05/13/2010 08:33 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:32:52AM +0200, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Jes Sorensenjes.soren...@redhat.com
Add -version-simple argument for QEMU, printing just the version
number, without any supporting text.
This makes it simpler
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 08:27:54AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 05/13/2010 08:33 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:32:52AM +0200, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Jes Sorensenjes.soren...@redhat.com
Add -version-simple argument for QEMU, printing just the
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 01:24:44PM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com writes:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:42:57AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com writes:
[...]
It would also be nice to avoid having to parse the
On 05/14/2010 05:06 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:42:57AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Daniel P. Berrangeberra...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:32:52AM +0200, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Jes
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 08:48:58AM -0500, Anthony Liguori wrote:
On 05/14/2010 05:06 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 11:42:57AM +0200, Markus Armbruster wrote:
Daniel P. Berrangeberra...@redhat.com writes:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:32:52AM +0200,
Anthony Liguori aligu...@linux.vnet.ibm.com writes:
Can we do this all via the monitor? IOW, can libvirt invoke qemu
blindly and strictly interact with the monitor?
I think that's exactly where should be heading longer term. It's not a
practical immediate solution, e.g. because device_add
From: Jes Sorensen jes.soren...@redhat.com
Add -version-simple argument for QEMU, printing just the version
number, without any supporting text.
This makes it simpler for other apps, such as libvirt, to parse the
version string from QEMU independant of how the naming string may
change.
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:32:52AM +0200, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Jes Sorensen jes.soren...@redhat.com
Add -version-simple argument for QEMU, printing just the version
number, without any supporting text.
This makes it simpler for other apps, such as libvirt, to parse the
On 05/13/10 15:33, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
This omits the KVM version string which is something we also want to see.
It would also be nice to avoid having to parse the -help output to determine
ARGV supported too. I wonder if it would be a good idea to just produce a
well structured
On 5/13/10, Daniel P. Berrange berra...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 10:32:52AM +0200, jes.soren...@redhat.com wrote:
From: Jes Sorensen jes.soren...@redhat.com
Add -version-simple argument for QEMU, printing just the version
number, without any supporting text.
13 matches
Mail list logo
