Am 10.08.2012 05:16, schrieb Peter A. G. Crosthwaite:
From: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
The current implementation of Interfaces is poorly designed. Each interface
that an object implements ends up being an object that's tracked by the
implementing object. There's all sorts of
On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 7:15 PM, Andreas Färber afaer...@suse.de wrote:
Am 10.08.2012 05:16, schrieb Peter A. G. Crosthwaite:
From: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
The current implementation of Interfaces is poorly designed. Each interface
that an object implements ends up being an
From: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
The current implementation of Interfaces is poorly designed. Each interface
that an object implements ends up being an object that's tracked by the
implementing object. There's all sorts of gymnastics to deal with casting
between these objects.
But an
From: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
The current implementation of Interfaces is poorly designed. Each interface
that an object implements ends up being an object that's tracked by the
implementing object. There's all sorts of gymnastics to deal with casting
between these objects.
But an
Il 08/08/2012 01:46, Peter Crosthwaite ha scritto:
Hi All,
We seem to be having difficulty getting a review/merge on this patch. I
have sent two series, two pings and a PULL, with only a single reply
from P. Maydell asking for other reviewers to weigh in:
- on July 17 P. Maydell
Hi All,
We seem to be having difficulty getting a review/merge on this patch. I
have sent two series, two pings and a PULL, with only a single reply
from P. Maydell asking for other reviewers to weigh in:
- on July 17 P. Maydell wrote ---
I guess I should mention that I'm
From: Anthony Liguori aligu...@us.ibm.com
The current implementation of Interfaces is poorly designed. Each interface
that an object implements ends up being an object that's tracked by the
implementing object. There's all sorts of gymnastics to deal with casting
between these objects.
But an
