Quoting Markus Armbruster (2017-05-31 12:05:16)
> Markus Armbruster writes:
>
> > "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" writes:
> >
> >> I notice this pair of patches doesn't seem to have gone anywhere.
> >> WHile it's labelled as a monitor fix, it's all QOM stuff, so
Markus Armbruster writes:
> "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" writes:
>
>> I notice this pair of patches doesn't seem to have gone anywhere.
>> WHile it's labelled as a monitor fix, it's all QOM stuff, so I don't
>> think it should be going via me.
>
> It's
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" writes:
> I notice this pair of patches doesn't seem to have gone anywhere.
> WHile it's labelled as a monitor fix, it's all QOM stuff, so I don't
> think it should be going via me.
It's somewhere between QOM and QemuOpts. Andreas, please have a
I notice this pair of patches doesn't seem to have gone anywhere.
WHile it's labelled as a monitor fix, it's all QOM stuff, so I don't
think it should be going via me.
Dave
* Michael Roth (mdr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com) wrote:
> check-qom-proplist originally added tests for verifying that
>
check-qom-proplist originally added tests for verifying that
object-creation helpers object_new_with_{props,propv} behaved in
similar fashion to the "traditional" method involving setting each
individual property separately after object creation rather than
via a single call.
Another similar