On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 21:58:21 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> It turns out (as will be clear from follow-up patches)
> we do not really need any kvm para macros host side
> for now, except on x86, and there we need it
> unconditionally whether we run on kvm or we don't.
>
>
On Wed, 18 Apr 2018 19:05:15 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:54:26AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> > On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 21:58:21 +0300
> > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> >
> > > It turns out (as will be clear from follow-up
On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 09:54:26AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 21:58:21 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
>
> > It turns out (as will be clear from follow-up patches)
> > we do not really need any kvm para macros host side
> > for now, except on x86, and
On Tue, 17 Apr 2018 21:58:21 +0300
"Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote:
> It turns out (as will be clear from follow-up patches)
> we do not really need any kvm para macros host side
> for now, except on x86, and there we need it
> unconditionally whether we run on kvm or we don't.
>
>
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 09:58:21PM +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> It turns out (as will be clear from follow-up patches)
> we do not really need any kvm para macros host side
> for now, except on x86, and there we need it
> unconditionally whether we run on kvm or we don't.
>
> Import the x86
It turns out (as will be clear from follow-up patches)
we do not really need any kvm para macros host side
for now, except on x86, and there we need it
unconditionally whether we run on kvm or we don't.
Import the x86 asm/kvm_para.h into standard-headers,
follow-up patches remove a bunch of code