On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 09:19:13PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 January 2011 18:48, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:34:38PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> In helper_fnmadd() and helper_fnmsub():
> >> if (likely(!float64_is_quiet_nan(farg1.d)))
> >>
On 6 January 2011 18:48, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:34:38PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> In helper_fnmadd() and helper_fnmsub():
>> if (likely(!float64_is_quiet_nan(farg1.d)))
>> farg1.d = float64_chs(farg1.d);
>>
>> is I think OK but somebody else mig
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:34:38PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Similarly I'm dubious about uses in helper_fsel, helper_fcmpu
> and helper_fcmpo, efsctsi, efsctui, efsctsiz, efsctuiz, efsctsf,
> efsctuf and all the helper_efd* functions. I haven't actually
> checked them all, but for instance efdc
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 06:43:28PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 January 2011 18:13, Stuart Brady wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 08:58:17AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 5 January 2011 23:13, Stuart Brady wrote:
> >> > I do have a few concerns regarding SoftFloat, though:
> >> >
>
On 6 January 2011 18:13, Stuart Brady wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 08:58:17AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 5 January 2011 23:13, Stuart Brady wrote:
>> > I do have a few concerns regarding SoftFloat, though:
>> >
>> > FIXMEs should be left in the code (or a document maintained on the
>
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 03:34:38PM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 6 January 2011 14:35, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:13:06PM +, Stuart Brady wrote:
> >> Is there any plan to deal with use of float*_is_quiet_nan(), where
> >> float*_is_any_nan() was intended? Th
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 08:58:17AM +, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 5 January 2011 23:13, Stuart Brady wrote:
> > I do have a few concerns regarding SoftFloat, though:
> >
> > FIXMEs should be left in the code (or a document maintained on the
> > Wiki) to keep track of which architectures have
On 6 January 2011 14:35, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:13:06PM +, Stuart Brady wrote:
>> Is there any plan to deal with use of float*_is_quiet_nan(), where
>> float*_is_any_nan() was intended? These should really either be
>> fixed (and tested), or if not, a FIXM
On Thu, Jan 06, 2011 at 02:10:36PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 05.01.2011 um 11:21 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
>> I'll commit it in 6 months if
>> nothing has changed with regards to HPPA.
>
> Just pointing out that there were 5 months without activity from
> yourself last year. It happens, Rea
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:13:06PM +, Stuart Brady wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:21:06AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>
> > But that's not the subject we are talking about HPPA guest support.
> > target-hppa fork still (partially) uses dyngen code, which we don't
> > support in upstrea
Am 05.01.2011 um 11:21 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 09:15:43AM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 05.01.2011 um 00:56 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
HPPA code has still to be ported
to TCG.
Yes it still uses dyngen.
Oh. I was pretty sure I saw TCG host support patches...
Yes, the
On 5 January 2011 23:13, Stuart Brady wrote:
> I do have a few concerns regarding SoftFloat, though:
>
> FIXMEs should be left in the code (or a document maintained on the
> Wiki) to keep track of which architectures have been considered
> (which I believe are x86, arm, mips, ppc) and which
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 11:21:06AM +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> But that's not the subject we are talking about HPPA guest support.
> target-hppa fork still (partially) uses dyngen code, which we don't
> support in upstream for more than *2 years*.
I'd agree -- the fork is currently dead. Wh
On Wed, Jan 05, 2011 at 09:15:43AM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 05.01.2011 um 00:56 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
>
> >On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:53:01PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> >>Am 04.01.2011 um 21:07 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
> >>
> >>>On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 08:54:04PM +0100, Andreas Färbe
Am 05.01.2011 um 00:56 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:53:01PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 04.01.2011 um 21:07 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 08:54:04PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 03.01.2011 um 15:34 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
We don't have any HPP
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 11:53:01PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 04.01.2011 um 21:07 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
>
>> On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 08:54:04PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
>>> Am 03.01.2011 um 15:34 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
>>>
We don't have any HPPA target, so let's remove HPPA speci
Am 04.01.2011 um 21:07 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 08:54:04PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
Am 03.01.2011 um 15:34 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
We don't have any HPPA target, so let's remove HPPA specific code.
It
can be re-added when someone adds an HPPA target.
Signed-off-b
On Tue, Jan 04, 2011 at 08:54:04PM +0100, Andreas Färber wrote:
> Am 03.01.2011 um 15:34 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
>
>> We don't have any HPPA target, so let's remove HPPA specific code. It
>> can be re-added when someone adds an HPPA target.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno
>
> There actually is
Am 03.01.2011 um 15:34 schrieb Aurelien Jarno:
We don't have any HPPA target, so let's remove HPPA specific code. It
can be re-added when someone adds an HPPA target.
Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno
There actually is such a project on SourceForge [1, 2].
Does it really hurt to leave TARGET_HP
Peter Maydell a écrit :
> On 3 January 2011 14:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>> We don't have any HPPA target, so let's remove HPPA specific code. It
>> can be re-added when someone adds an HPPA target.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno
>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell
>
> Do we want to get rid of
On 3 January 2011 14:34, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> We don't have any HPPA target, so let's remove HPPA specific code. It
> can be re-added when someone adds an HPPA target.
>
> Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell
Do we want to get rid of the one remaining TARGET_HPPA which
i
We don't have any HPPA target, so let's remove HPPA specific code. It
can be re-added when someone adds an HPPA target.
Signed-off-by: Aurelien Jarno
---
fpu/softfloat-specialize.h |6 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fpu/softfloat-specialize.h b/fpu/soft
22 matches
Mail list logo
