Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 11/30/2011 10:27 PM, Erik Rull wrote:
Erik, if you can test on your Debian 4.0 installation, that would be
nice. Thanks!
I will do so. Can you provide me a snapshot (.tgz) of the git? I have
heard that there are possibilities to create the tgz over some web
interfaces
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 11/30/2011 10:27 PM, Erik Rull wrote:
Erik, if you can test on your Debian 4.0 installation, that would be
nice. Thanks!
I will do so. Can you provide me a snapshot (.tgz) of the git? I have
heard that there are possibilities to create the tgz over some web
interfaces
On 11/30/2011 10:27 PM, Erik Rull wrote:
Erik, if you can test on your Debian 4.0 installation, that would be
nice. Thanks!
I will do so. Can you provide me a snapshot (.tgz) of the git? I have
heard that there are possibilities to create the tgz over some web
interfaces of git, but I didn't
Paolo Bonzini wrote:
On 11/28/2011 11:36 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Hrm, I may have messed this up. My mailbox processing script seems to
have found Aneesh's patch instead of Paolo's.
Can ya'll take a look at 2507718baf311ea78156c6777d38410a9f89ce89 and
tell me if I need to revert it?
No,
On 11/28/2011 11:36 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
Hrm, I may have messed this up. My mailbox processing script seems to
have found Aneesh's patch instead of Paolo's.
Can ya'll take a look at 2507718baf311ea78156c6777d38410a9f89ce89 and
tell me if I need to revert it?
No, qemu.git master is
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 16:36:18 -0600, Anthony Liguori anth...@codemonkey.ws
wrote:
On 11/23/2011 12:16 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:29:11 +0100, Paolo Bonzinipbonz...@redhat.com
wrote:
Small requirements on new features have percolated to virtio-9p-local.c.
In
On 11/23/2011 12:16 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:29:11 +0100, Paolo Bonzinipbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Small requirements on new features have percolated to virtio-9p-local.c.
In particular, the utimensat wrapper actually only supports dirfd = AT_FDCWD
and flags =
On Wed, 23 Nov 2011 08:24:53 +0100, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
On 11/23/2011 07:16 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
We would also require same changes for virtio-9p-handle.c right ?
virtio-9p-handle.c is only for recent Linux and you can assume the ioctl
is defined there.
But the
On 11/23/2011 04:11 PM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
virtio-9p-handle.c is only for recent Linux and you can assume the ioctl
is defined there.
But the file gets build by default right ? ie, we would build
virtio-9p-handle.c and if FS_IOC_GETVERSION is not defined, build will
fail right ?
I
On Mon, 21 Nov 2011 09:29:11 +0100, Paolo Bonzini pbonz...@redhat.com wrote:
Small requirements on new features have percolated to virtio-9p-local.c.
In particular, the utimensat wrapper actually only supports dirfd = AT_FDCWD
and flags = AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW in the fallback code. Remove the
On 11/23/2011 07:16 AM, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
We would also require same changes for virtio-9p-handle.c right ?
virtio-9p-handle.c is only for recent Linux and you can assume the ioctl
is defined there.
Paolo
Small requirements on new features have percolated to virtio-9p-local.c.
In particular, the utimensat wrapper actually only supports dirfd = AT_FDCWD
and flags = AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW in the fallback code. Remove the arguments
so that virtio-9p-local.c will not use AT_* constants.
At the same
On 11/21/2011 02:29 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
Small requirements on new features have percolated to virtio-9p-local.c.
In particular, the utimensat wrapper actually only supports dirfd = AT_FDCWD
and flags = AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW in the fallback code. Remove the arguments
so that virtio-9p-local.c
On 11/21/2011 10:01 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
-return qemu_utimensat(AT_FDCWD, rpath(s, path, buffer), buf,
- AT_SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW);
+return qemu_utimens(rpath(s, path, buffer), buf);
Hrm, I thought the SYMLINK_NOFOLLOW was critical in enforcing security?
14 matches
Mail list logo
