On 11/07/2011 05:10 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > This is more of an edge case however, since we know that hardware tools
> > rely on PCI IDs.
>
> The ID is invalid, you can't do anything useful with it ...
>
> > For example our hypothetical ABI signature tool will
> > certainly include ls
Hi,
> This is more of an edge case however, since we know that hardware tools
> rely on PCI IDs.
The ID is invalid, you can't do anything useful with it ...
> For example our hypothetical ABI signature tool will
> certainly include lspci like functionality and detect this as a change.
... exc
On 11/07/2011 04:53 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
>> I think so, but that's unrelated. The worry is that some DRM code
>> checksums your hardware and complains if it changed too much. Nothing
>> to do with the test suite.
>>
>> The sense of Gerd's comment is reversed. We should preserve the ABI
>>
On 11/07/2011 08:50 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/07/2011 04:44 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This a guest ABI change. Do we want -M support for it?
Given that the old subsystem id isn't valid I'd say no unless someone
comes up with a good reason.
Do we know that Windows won't complain about it?
On 11/07/2011 04:44 PM, Anthony Liguori wrote:
This a guest ABI change. Do we want -M support for it?
>>>
>>> Given that the old subsystem id isn't valid I'd say no unless someone
>>> comes up with a good reason.
>>
>> Do we know that Windows won't complain about it?
>
>
> I thought the origi
On 11/07/2011 08:42 AM, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/07/2011 04:33 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 11/07/11 15:17, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/07/2011 01:00 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
This patch removes the code lines which set the subsystem id for the
emulated ac97 card to 8086:. Due to the device id b
On 11/07/2011 04:33 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> On 11/07/11 15:17, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 11/07/2011 01:00 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> >> This patch removes the code lines which set the subsystem id for the
> >> emulated ac97 card to 8086:. Due to the device id being zero the
> >> subsystem id
On 11/07/2011 08:33 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
On 11/07/11 15:17, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/07/2011 01:00 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
This patch removes the code lines which set the subsystem id for the
emulated ac97 card to 8086:. Due to the device id being zero the
subsystem id isn't vaild anyw
On 11/07/11 15:17, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/07/2011 01:00 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> This patch removes the code lines which set the subsystem id for the
>> emulated ac97 card to 8086:. Due to the device id being zero the
>> subsystem id isn't vaild anyway. With the patch applied the sound
On 11/07/2011 01:00 PM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> This patch removes the code lines which set the subsystem id for the
> emulated ac97 card to 8086:. Due to the device id being zero the
> subsystem id isn't vaild anyway. With the patch applied the sound card
> gets the default qemu subsystem id
This patch removes the code lines which set the subsystem id for the
emulated ac97 card to 8086:. Due to the device id being zero the
subsystem id isn't vaild anyway. With the patch applied the sound card
gets the default qemu subsystem id (1af4:1100) instead.
Cc: Takashi Iwai
Signed-off-by
11 matches
Mail list logo
