Il 01/08/2014 09:35, Ming Lei ha scritto:
> OK, I will convert non-dataplane to support multi virtqueues in V1,
> and the conversion is not difficult and straightforward.
>
> BTW, docs/migration.txt mentions that "QEMU has to be launched
> with the same arguments the two times", so can I understan
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 2:10 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 01/08/2014 05:09, Ming Lei ha scritto:
>> Per virtio spec, only the feature is set, the VM can be allowed to
>> access the 'num_queues' field, and I didn't see any problem from
>> VM's view point.
>>
>> So could you
Il 01/08/2014 05:09, Ming Lei ha scritto:
>>> >> Per virtio spec, only the feature is set, the VM can be allowed to
>>> >> access the 'num_queues' field, and I didn't see any problem from
>>> >> VM's view point.
>>> >>
>>> >> So could you explain why both dataplane and non-dataplane have
>>> >> to
On Fri, Aug 1, 2014 at 11:09 AM, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>
>> It doesn't matter, changing features between dataplane and non-dataplane
>> is not something that you can do.
>
> Actually it is easy to support multi virtqueue for non-dataplane,
> and
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 4:52 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 31/07/2014 05:47, Ming Lei ha scritto:
>> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>>> Il 30/07/2014 17:12, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>>
>> Dataplane must not be a change to the guest ABI. If you implement this
Il 31/07/2014 05:47, Ming Lei ha scritto:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> Il 30/07/2014 17:12, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>
> Dataplane must not be a change to the guest ABI. If you implement this
> feature you have to implement it for both dataplane an
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:25 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 30/07/2014 17:12, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>>> >
>>> > Dataplane must not be a change to the guest ABI. If you implement this
>>> > feature you have to implement it for both dataplane and non-dataplne.
>>> >
IMO, no matter if the
Il 30/07/2014 17:12, Michael S. Tsirkin ha scritto:
>> >
>> > Dataplane must not be a change to the guest ABI. If you implement this
>> > feature you have to implement it for both dataplane and non-dataplne.
>> >
>> > Paolo
> Actually, I think different backends at runtime should be allowed to
>
On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 04:01:59PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 30/07/2014 13:39, Ming Lei ha scritto:
> > Now we only support multi vqs for dataplane case.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei
> > ---
> > hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 18 +-
> > include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.
Il 30/07/2014 13:39, Ming Lei ha scritto:
> Now we only support multi vqs for dataplane case.
>
> Signed-off-by: Ming Lei
> ---
> hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 18 +-
> include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h |1 +
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --gi
Now we only support multi vqs for dataplane case.
Signed-off-by: Ming Lei
---
hw/block/virtio-blk.c | 18 +-
include/hw/virtio/virtio-blk.h |1 +
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/hw/block/virtio-blk.c b/hw/block/virtio-blk.c
index ab99
11 matches
Mail list logo
