Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com
---
hw/tcx.c | 152 ++---
1 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/tcx.c b/hw/tcx.c
index 309600d..cd24100 100644
--- a/hw/tcx.c
+++ b/hw/tcx.c
@@ -40,7 +40,15 @@
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 8:48 PM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/17/2011 09:13 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
- ret = cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty(page, VGA_DIRTY_FLAG);
+ ret = memory_region_get_dirty(s-vram_mem, page, DIRTY_MEMORY_VGA);
for (off = 0; off TARGET_PAGE_SIZE * 4;
On 10/18/2011 08:08 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
What would the API look like? accept a range, return true if any of the
pages in the range are dirty?
That would be 1:1 conversion but maybe better approach would be to
return the first dirty address (or zero if not found), then various
bitmap
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 7:40 PM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
On 10/18/2011 08:08 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
What would the API look like? accept a range, return true if any of the
pages in the range are dirty?
That would be 1:1 conversion but maybe better approach would be to
return the
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com
---
hw/tcx.c | 152 ++---
1 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/tcx.c b/hw/tcx.c
index 309600d..cd24100 100644
--- a/hw/tcx.c
+++ b/hw/tcx.c
@@ -40,7 +40,15 @@
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity a...@redhat.com
---
hw/tcx.c | 152 ++---
1 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 67 deletions(-)
diff --git a/hw/tcx.c b/hw/tcx.c
index
On 10/17/2011 09:13 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
-ret = cpu_physical_memory_get_dirty(page, VGA_DIRTY_FLAG);
+ret = memory_region_get_dirty(s-vram_mem, page, DIRTY_MEMORY_VGA);
for (off = 0; off TARGET_PAGE_SIZE * 4; off += TARGET_PAGE_SIZE) {
-ret |=
