On Tue, 2016-06-07 at 11:40 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> Ugh, this patch too is showing as corrupt for me. I suspect the
> problem is on my end, but I have no idea what, yet.
No it's on mine. The latest update of evolution in Fedora broke sending
patches :-(
It unconditionally replaces 2 or
On Mon, Jun 06, 2016 at 07:52:48PM +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> The processor only uses some bits of the address and invalidates an
> entire congruence class. Some OSes such as Darwin and HelenOS take
> advantage of this and occasionally invalidate the entire TLB by just
> doing a series
On 06/06/2016 11:52 AM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote:
> The processor only uses some bits of the address and invalidates an
> entire congruence class. Some OSes such as Darwin and HelenOS take
> advantage of this and occasionally invalidate the entire TLB by just
> doing a series of 64 consecutive
The processor only uses some bits of the address and invalidates an
entire congruence class. Some OSes such as Darwin and HelenOS take
advantage of this and occasionally invalidate the entire TLB by just
doing a series of 64 consecutive tlbie for example.
Our code tries to be too smart here only
